Is 4690k worth extra?

TheUltimateNoob123

Distinguished
Jan 18, 2014
190
0
18,710
I've been going in circles trying to choose between getting a mobo and i5 4590 for about £220 or spending an extra £60 and getting a mobo, i5 4690k and hyper 212 evo. Would it be worth spending the extra £60 or would it be better to save it and get a gtx 970 sooner. I'm 15 so while it would be nice to spend all my money on the best parts I would like to have some left over because I'm not going to make it back any time soon. And advice or opinions are appreciated. :)

Also if you have any cheap motherboard recommendations they would be greatly appreciated.
 
Solution
In your case, NO.

The CPU is far less likely to be the bottleneck in a game so having more money to put towards the graphics card will give you the best return.

If you can afford an i5-4590 and GTX970 that's a really good combination.

Other:
I recommend learning how to TWEAK your game quality carefully. In particular, understand how to force on "Adaptive VSYNC"; for example:

1. turn on FRAPS and the GAME
2. Turn VSYNC OFF
3. Run game and adjust resolution (usually 1920x1080), and anti-aliasing, shadows etc for the best visuals that get you above 60FPS (for 60Hz monitor) at least 90% of the time.

4. Force on Adaptive VSYNC (NVidia Control Panel-> Manage 3D Settings-> Add game->...)
5. Verify you're locked to 60FPS now most of the...
I'd say save your money and buy a better graphics card. I have two gtx 970s and an i5 4690k processor. I'm not going to get any bottlnecking any time soon, but if I'd put my money towards a better processor rather than my 970s, I wouldn't be playing at 1440p right now. The i5 4590 is a pretty good processor so that's my suggestion, invest in your gpu(s).
 
Worth is something only YOU can determine.
For a balanced gamer, budget about 2x the cpu cost for your graphics card.
By that rule, a lesser I5 would be appropriate for a GTX970.

Consider another option:
Buy a I7-4790K. Yes, it costs more, but it does not need to be overclocked, running stock 4.0/4.4. You can use the supplied Intel cooler, and a Less expensive H97 motherboard will do the job.
M-ATX is cheaper if you will forego sli capability.
I don't know how that would price out where you buy.
 
In your case, NO.

The CPU is far less likely to be the bottleneck in a game so having more money to put towards the graphics card will give you the best return.

If you can afford an i5-4590 and GTX970 that's a really good combination.

Other:
I recommend learning how to TWEAK your game quality carefully. In particular, understand how to force on "Adaptive VSYNC"; for example:

1. turn on FRAPS and the GAME
2. Turn VSYNC OFF
3. Run game and adjust resolution (usually 1920x1080), and anti-aliasing, shadows etc for the best visuals that get you above 60FPS (for 60Hz monitor) at least 90% of the time.

4. Force on Adaptive VSYNC (NVidia Control Panel-> Manage 3D Settings-> Add game->...)
5. Verify you're locked to 60FPS now most of the time
6. Play game
7. If screen tear is too frequent then drop a few settings to raise frame rate (With Adaptive VSYNC, VSYNC is automatically turned off below 60FPS on a 60Hz monitor to avoid stutter but then you get screen tearing).

*For some games it may be preferable to turn VSYNC OFF but you can investigate that yourself. Eventually, GSYNC monitor will be the way to go but they currently cost a premium (when you do get one make sure it's got a range of 30Hz to 144Hz not something like 30Hz to 60Hz).

Cheers.
 
Solution