the benchmarks show that AMD ryzen chips are close to or on par with the CPU you have so all you would be spending money on is an updated CPU that has the same performance. there are also reports out that they have less L2 and L3 cache then Intel CPU's too
the benchmarks show that AMD ryzen chips are close to or on par with the CPU you have so all you would be spending money on is an updated CPU that has the same performance. there are also reports out that they have less L2 and L3 cache then Intel CPU's too
What Ryzen are you talking about? The 1700X/1800X have loads more Cache than the Intel mainstream i5/i7 and the workstation performance is leagues ahead of the 4790K. Only problem they suffer with at the moment is gaming performance in which they usually hover around the i5 7600K's performance most the time except 1 or 2 Vulkan games it was neck and neck with the i7-7700K.
It depends on what you are using the PC for. If you are doing highly threaded tasks it might be worth it, although for $600 to get to the 1800x, it wuld b hard to justify IMO. Have you Overclocked your 4790? It really is still a high end processor.
Recent gaming benchmarks show 1600x beating 4790K about 2 to 3 fps in some titles. I myself want to build myself a new rig, and was thinking about Ryzen 1600x.