> JimmyJoeLard,
>
> Interesting variation in the maximum amount of RAM used by the T3400 See P 33 of the User's Manual
>
>
ftp://ftp.dell.com/Manuals/all-products/esuprt_desktop/esuprt_dell_precision_workstation/precision-t3400_user%27s%20guide_en-us.pdf
>
> "About Your Computer
> p 33
>
> Memory
> Type 667-MHz ECC and non-ECC and 800-MHz
> ECC DDR2 SDRAM
> Memory connectors four
> Memory capacities 512 MB, 1 GB, or 2 GB
> Minimum memory 1 GB
> Maximum memory 4 GB for 32-bit operating systems
> 8 GB for 64-bit operating systems
> which specifies 4GB max for 32-bit OS and 8GB for 64 bit and that a maximum 2GB module can be used.
> Are you sure your T3400 is recognizing the entire 16GB?
> Perhaps the online Dell manual was for the earliest version?
The Bios sees it in setup. The OS sees it in Resouce Monitor. Neither treats it as remarkable.
There's a loose collection of internet discussion on this subject, and the nut of it is probably at
http://forums.crucial.com/t5/Standard-DRAM-Memory
/Max-memory-size-in-Dell-Precision-T3400/td-p/8146
The last post on the page suggests that 4 GB modules emerged only while marketing efforts for the T3400 ended. In that case, it would not have paid to recertify when their focus had moved on to their next entry level workstation. Happily, the Bios was kept current for a while after they stopped selling it.
I undertook this rehab project to better support an XP32 VM guest where I keep a clean workplace env for VPN. I installed Win 7 64, Intel 520 240GB, 16 GB memory. My graphics card interest is a diversion, not central.
> I agree that DDR2 RAM is outrageously expensive, although I found a way around it- buy used RAM for the equivalent Dell Poweredge server.
> For my Precision T5400 I recently bought 4 X 2GB Dell/ Samsung for $30, this from a Poweredge 2950. Another thing that shocks me is how
> hot this DDR2 can run. Although I never saw any thermal-related problems, I started monitoring after a long rendering slog, I once saw
> 93C (197F) and panicked. However, it usually runs at 65-70C and I saw posts of people with the temperature regularly in the 80's C.
> I mention this as you may want to make certain that everything in the cooling department of your T3400 is in order. - Now I'm an obsessive
> cleaner of fans and case grids, and brushing between the RAM modules. I wonder if there's such a thing as "RAM floss"?
I added a 92mm exhaust fan to the square holes grill on the back, behind the memory. I should reach in there and feel it after raising the CPUZ temp (3 of the 4 temp sensors are stuck!).
> You're lucky too to have the Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz. The T3400 could have an 800, 1066, or 1333 FSB and the Q9560 is a 1333 FSB CPU
> (or if a T3400 has a 1066 FSB, it will run at 2.13). Perhaps the 1333 FSB version supports 16GB RAM? When I see eBay listings for the
> T3400 I seem to always see dual core 2.0, 2.4's and 2.6's, so you have the hot rod version- well done10
It's from an eBay refurbisher in 2009 who positioned it as a cheap gamer machine, hence the MSI geForce card. I bought it simply because I had a T3400 on my desktop at work that seemed reliable. That work machine is still running, BTW, after over five years.
> As for the R7750 replacement, the user manual says (p34):
> 375-W PSU
> 75-W PCI Express x16 (single or dual)
...
> 525-W PSU
> 75-W PCI Express x16 (single or dual);
> 150-W PCI Express x16 (single or dual);
> 225-W PCI Express x16 and 75-W PCI
> Express x16
I'm still running on the 325W after I got suckered on the D525AF-01. The correct unit's on the way. It'll have two six-pin aux display card cables, and I figure that'll be good for a 225 watt card if I really want one.
> - so if you have the 525W PS you can have 2X 150W cards, giving a lot of possibilities. I use a Quadro FX 4800 (1.5GB) in the T5400
> and that's a very good CAD card ($1,200 new) that runs at about 150W. If you have the 375W, it appears limited to 1X or 2X 75W , but
> there are still some very good choices in that range.
> You state in your reply,> "abhanan93, Don't use an Nvidia card. They're not compatible with most examples of the x38 chipset,
> including the one on my T3400 board per GPU-Z with the geForce gts250 that I then pulled. The geForce driver will negotiate
> down to PCI-E 1.1 when it sees the chipset version. See Nvidia KB Answer ID 2767."< ,
> However, almost every T3400 I've ever seen in person or advertised has an NVIDIA card Quadro, NVS, or GeForce installed. My brother's
> architectural office still uses 2005 Precision 390's- which is the 3400 predecessor- same number of DDR-2 667 RAM slots with an 8GB maximum,
> Socket 775 with a Core 2 Duo @1.86GHz, 1066 FSB , and his machines are still happily using their original 128MB Quadro 550's- and 2GB RAM on
> XP 32-bit! A few days ago, I bought my brother's 390 a gift, a 1GB DDR3 Radeon 4670 with 2X DVI on Ebay for $0.99 + $12.00 shipping! Plus
> I will be giving him the 4 X 1GB RAM modules I replaced in the T5400 and my no longer used copy of XP PRO 64-bit.
The 390 is pre-x38, and therefore pre-PCI-E gen 2, so unaffected by the Nvidia bug..
This problem came at the end of 2009, after a forceware driver that came after 186.18. There's much more discussion of this issue than about 16 GB T3400s. It's apparently only a problem on a subset of x38 chipset MB implementations. Empirically, I can say that my T3400 is affected. On the other hand, maybe the difference between 2.0 and 1.1 is no worse than the difference between 3.0 and 2.0.
> In thinking about a new graphics card, for what use do you put the T3400?
I want a single card to drive my single 2560x1600 at full screen with superior multimedia decompression and a smooth frame rate. I'm not a gamer, but I collect video clips. The R7750 is fine for work, but mpgs, wmvs, flvs etc. look awful. Maybe I should just use the old Nvidia. But it dumbs down the bus! We have principles.
Cheers