[SOLVED] Is using 4 DIMMS on a dual channel motherboard/cpu pointless?

_dawn_chorus_

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2017
565
56
19,090
I just wanted to upgrade from 16 to 32 gb of ram now that its cheap. I currently have 2x8 in 2 of my 4 available slots on the motherboard, and was going to just buy 2 more of the same sticks I already have but from what I gather using 4 slots would be pointless and perhaps detrimental to performance because my cpu and motherboard can only run dual channel. Meaning I should just buy 2x16gb sticks and sell my old ones.
Can someone clear this up for me?
Why do I see so many "gaming" builds with all 4 slots populated? Just for aesthetic reasons?
How does it change/affect performance populating all 4 slots for a dual channel motherboard?

Cpu: i7-8700k
Mobo: Gigabyte Aorus Pro z390

I mainly use my computer for music production and am hitting 75% usage on some projects for memory.
 
Solution
Performance? Almost none. Either 2 or 4 performance at the same speeds and size will be negligible, 2 DIMMs might perform slightly better on synthetic benchmarks but not enough to make you look twice.

Using two dimms vs 4 however would bet better in terms of MC stress, less DIMMs less work, and potentially better overclocking if you plan to do that.

The main purpose for having 4 slots is to maximize how much memory you can get into the system, which most mainstream boards is 64GB with 4 16GB DIMMs (more once 32GB becomes more mainstream but that will be more prevalent with DDR5 most likely).

Plus looks. 4 DIMMs looks better than 2 I guess.
Performance? Almost none. Either 2 or 4 performance at the same speeds and size will be negligible, 2 DIMMs might perform slightly better on synthetic benchmarks but not enough to make you look twice.

Using two dimms vs 4 however would bet better in terms of MC stress, less DIMMs less work, and potentially better overclocking if you plan to do that.

The main purpose for having 4 slots is to maximize how much memory you can get into the system, which most mainstream boards is 64GB with 4 16GB DIMMs (more once 32GB becomes more mainstream but that will be more prevalent with DDR5 most likely).

Plus looks. 4 DIMMs looks better than 2 I guess.
 
Solution
Performance? Almost none. Either 2 or 4 performance at the same speeds and size will be negligible, 2 DIMMs might perform slightly better on synthetic benchmarks but not enough to make you look twice.

Using two dimms vs 4 however would bet better in terms of MC stress, less DIMMs less work, and potentially better overclocking if you plan to do that.

The main purpose for having 4 slots is to maximize how much memory you can get into the system, which most mainstream boards is 64GB with 4 16GB DIMMs (more once 32GB becomes more mainstream but that will be more prevalent with DDR5 most likely).

Plus looks. 4 DIMMs looks better than 2 I guess.

Thanks for the answer!
What is "MC Stress" though?
 
Currently I'm using a 4x8Gb set with my 8700k and Z390, but it was an aesthetic choice(RGB ram just looks better with all the slots populated). If Aesthetic's wasn't an issue I would have likely just gone with a 2x16 kit.

Lol ok awesome I didn't expect you'd have the same general set up too. I have the P400s case so nothing can be seen anyway, but I will have to sell my 2x8 to justify buying 2x16 likely at a small loss.. NewEgg has the 2x8 kit of that ram for only $120 right now so guess I'll just go for 2 more sticks.
Thanks for all the help
 

Latest posts