[KMW Spoiler] NSA Trio

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Peter D Bakija wrote:

> And I'm saying it doesn't work. There is no circular logic--if you
> want to use combat, use combat that kills people. Otherwise, don't
> bother, as it isn't likely to do you any good. Bruise and Bleed is
> trying to oust without necessarily torping people, correct. So then
> why even build in the sketchy combat infrastructure in the first
> place?

Looks circular to me, but maybe I'm biased.

> Because you only have, say, 30 combat cards, you won't do much damage
> consistiently, and wne you do do more than 3 damage, it'll get
> dodged.

This just strikes me as pure pessimism. When you grapple and hit, it
will get prevented. Stop playing combat all together.

--

David Cherryholmes
david.cherryholmes@gmail.com

"OK. So be it. It's not my view, but whatever makes you
happy, right? I'm all about making you happy, Dave. 🙂"

-- LSJ, V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

pdb6@lightlink.com wrote:

> There are always going to be ways to make something work the way you
> want them to work, but so far, all of the examples of how medium combat
> is going to work have involved specific vampires that aleviate built in
> problems--say Taco Bell or Ignatzio (built in rush), Fatima (built in
> disguised weapon), or Nu (built in untap and super trumpy cards). You
> can certainly make a deck that works with medium combat. But they tend
> to be few and far between, and require a lot of effort to make them
> overcome their inherrent flaws.

So B&B can work, you just have to build it right?

--

David Cherryholmes
david.cherryholmes@gmail.com

"OK. So be it. It's not my view, but whatever makes you
happy, right? I'm all about making you happy, Dave. 🙂"

-- LSJ, V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

David Cherryholmes wrote:

> Looks circular to me, but maybe I'm biased.

You are.


Peter D Bakija
pdb6@lightlink.com
http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6

"How does this end?"
"In fire."
Emperor Turhan and Kosh

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

David Cherryholmes wrote:

> No, those were the two quotes that supported what you wanted to see.

The first one was from the guy who started the thread with a deck, and then
followed up with "and then I got tooled". The second was from the same guy,
who looked at someone else's deck provided as an example of what might work,
and the first guy said "Hmm. Doesn't look like the deck I'm trying to
make..."

Looks good to me.

> Look at the first deck posted, which most of the discussion
> is centered around.

I did. That was the one that got tooled.

>Also look for any poster that says anything to the
> effect that "these types of decks never work." You won't find any.

It isn't my fault people are deluded.

>You
> also won't find any in this thread, although being the lone nut
> supporting a position is the last thing I would say guarantees you are
> wrong.

Dude. I'm not, like, trying to get the rules changed. I'm just handing out
free advice, which everyone is free to ignore.

> Get back up, 'cause you aren't anywhere near done yet (unless, you know,
> you just want to be).

Bored now.


Peter D Bakija
pdb6@lightlink.com
http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6

"How does this end?"
"In fire."
Emperor Turhan and Kosh