News LAPD warns residents after spike in burglaries leveraging Wi-Fi jammers that halt security cameras, smart doorbells

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
-Fran- said:
Imagine they also learn you can permanently damage the camera sensor with a simple laser pointer.

Regards.
Click to expand...
I guess it's a good thing that most people don't have steady enough hands. Most people would need to be staring right into the camera to disable it. Kind of pointless. There is also no way of knowing if you disabled it. Might as well just hit it with spray paint or pull the cord.
 
It's where the benefit of local storage comes in, like Kasa and Wyze products, even if the WiFi is knocked out it continues to record locally so as long as the camera itself isn't stolen you still have the footage, which can be said too about hardwired recorders and their DVRs.

But if you have that high end stuff, get a proper wall safe or keep it in a safe deposit box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slightnitpick
Keith31383 said:
I guess it's a good thing that most people don't have steady enough hands. Most people would need to be staring right into the camera to disable it. Kind of pointless. There is also no way of knowing if you disabled it. Might as well just hit it with spray paint or pull the cord.
Click to expand...
It seems it wasn't obvious, but my post was heavily tongue in cheek.

You're not wrong and there's plenty other more "practical" ways to disable such systems, but the point is that, whomever is using the tech doesn't realize how easy it is to just ignore it altogether.

If someone really wants protection, depending on a ring is not going to deter actual robbers from breaking in.

Should no one buy this things? Not at all what I'm saying. These things have their use, but it's not "security". It's just a convenient gadget to use for when things "go as expected" as they offer absolutely nothing additional towards securing a home over already stablished home-security practices. As people have already mentioned: wired cameras are a must if security is a concern.

Regards.
 
CmdrShepard said:
I have a tip too -- USE THE DAMN WIRES FOR CRITICAL STUFF.
Click to expand...
It's true, but a lot of people just won't. A big selling point, for these products, is the ease-of-installation.

I think a partial solution might be for Ring to start selling Wi-Fi routers, or at least partnering with a few router manufacturers, so that your router can detect a jamming event and send a partially-anonymized, geo-located notification to the authorities. When police get multiple, proximate "pings" of a wi-fi jamming incident, they could send an officer on patrol to check it out.


BTW, does anyone know if Ring or other popular wi-fi cameras support powerline networking? This is definitely one use case where I'd consider it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Li Ken-un and ThomasKinsley
Makaveli said:
I wonder if these types of crimes happen in texas?
Click to expand...
I'd say it probably depends a lot more on the neighborhood than the state. For that, I'm sure you can find granular crime statistics, though I wouldn't happen to know where.

Wherever burglary rates are high, you can bet at least some of those burglars are integrating wi-fi jamming into their standard toolkit.
 
bit_user said:
It's true, but a lot of people just won't. A big selling point, for these products, is the ease-of-installation.
Click to expand...
Which is directly proportional with the ease of circumvention.

I am sure if you are not serious enough to use wires you could just buy a cheap $5 plastic security camera replica with a single battery and a LED and put it up and the effect would be roughly the same -- it would serve as a deterrent to the lowest of thiefs.
bit_user said:
I think a partial solution might be for Ring to start selling Wi-Fi routers, or at least partnering with a few router manufacturers, so that your router can detect a jamming event and send a partially-anonymized, geo-located notification to the authorities. When police get multiple, proximate "pings" of a wi-fi jamming incident, they could send an officer on patrol to check it out.
Click to expand...
So wait, you are ok with Ring shady business practices of sharing footage with law enforcement which they only supposedly stopped doing recently?
bit_user said:
BTW, does anyone know if Ring or other popular wi-fi cameras support powerline networking? This is definitely one use case where I'd consider it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and you could kill the comm with a powerline short then.
 
CmdrShepard said:
So wait, you are ok with Ring shady business practices of sharing footage with law enforcement which they only supposedly stopped doing recently?
Click to expand...
I think there's a meaningful distinction between that and merely allowing your router to notify them of a likely jamming event.

I will not comment on the "sharing footage" issue, as that's getting off-topic. Not to say it's not worthy of discussion, but probably best not in this thread.

CmdrShepard said:
Yeah, and you could kill the comm with a powerline short then.
Click to expand...
I have never used powerline networking, but I know it's been around (and fairly mainstream) for decades. I'd be interested in hearing a take on this, from someone with direct knowledge of the subject.
 
bit_user said:
I have never used powerline networking, but I know it's been around (and fairly mainstream) for decades. I'd be interested in hearing a take on this, from someone with direct knowledge of the subject.
Click to expand...
Ok, creating a short would need access to the line leading to the camera.

But, any power outlet in the house (or garage) sharing the same phase (i.e. being on a same circuit and not separated by a transformer) with powerline network adapter can surely also be jammed by a signal using the same frequency as those devices use.
 
CmdrShepard said:
Ok, creating a short would need access to the line leading to the camera.

But, any power outlet in the house (or garage) sharing the same phase (i.e. being on a same circuit and not separated by a transformer) with powerline network adapter can surely also be jammed by a signal using the same frequency as those devices use.
Click to expand...
Unless there is a known high value target, screwing with the house power is too much work.

Deterrence is the key.

If you have no security, easy target.

If all you have is a Ring, almost as easy.
WiFi is easy to jam.

I just have to make my house 'less easy' than my neighbors
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnforcedERROR, scottsoapbox, Hellman_x and 1 other person
USAFRet said:
Unless there is a known high value target, screwing with the house power is too much work.
Click to expand...
Who said anything about that? These cameras need power, one way or another. Couldn't you just use a power adapter that's compatible with powerline networking?

According to this, it's quite feasible to achieve gigabit speeds. For security cameras, that's a couple orders of magnitude more than you really need.

A nicely-integrated solution is described, here:

reolink.com

Powerline Camera: Everything You Need to Know

Looking for a cost-effective and seamless way to install security cameras without the hassle of complex wiring? Powerline cameras might be the solution you're looking for.
reolink.com
 
bit_user said:
Who said anything about that? These cameras need power, one way or another. Couldn't you just use a power adapter that's compatible with powerline networking?

According to this, it's quite feasible to achieve gigabit speeds. For security cameras, that's a couple orders of magnitude more than you really need.
​
​

A nicely-integrated solution is described, here:
​
reolink.com

Powerline Camera: Everything You Need to Know

Looking for a cost-effective and seamless way to install security cameras without the hassle of complex wiring? Powerline cameras might be the solution you're looking for.
reolink.com
​
Click to expand...
Reolink also has some that are solar powered.
Still WiFi.

(I have 3x Reolinks, hardwired PoE)
 
  • Like
Reactions: scottsoapbox
USAFRet said:
Reolink also has some that are solar powered.
Still WiFi.

(I have 3x Reolinks, hardwired PoE)
Click to expand...
Yes, I saw that. Still, I thought the linked page does a pretty nice job of describing a powline-based system. I'm not actually sure which (if any) of their products implement it. I started poking around, but that's really more time & effort than I want to invest in the matter.

The fact is that you could use the adapters I linked and deploy such a solution with any cameras that merely have an Ethernet port.


Also: some cameras have the ability to do local recording to a SD Card. Forgot to mention that, but it'd at least be useful for evidentiary purposes, after the fact.
 
bit_user said:
Yes, I saw that. Still, I thought the linked page does a pretty nice job of describing a powline-based system. I'm not actually sure which (if any) of their products implement it. I started poking around, but that's really more time & effort than I want to invest in the matter.

The fact is that you could use the adapters I linked and deploy such a solution with any cameras that merely have an Ethernet port.


Also: some cameras have the ability to do local recording to a SD Card. Forgot to mention that, but it'd at least be useful for evidentiary purposes, after the fact.
Click to expand...
There are multiple ways to get cameras up and running without WiFi.
But that requires thinking.

It seems people just want that Easy Button.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom