News LAPD warns residents after spike in burglaries leveraging Wi-Fi jammers that halt security cameras, smart doorbells

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem is what is a signal jammer. The police could likely go into anyone garage and find "burglar tools". Your neighbors router running on the same channel will jam your devices if the signal is stronger than the one from your router. If you were very stupid you could take the magnetron out of your microwave they run on the same 2.4g frequencies and put out 1000watts compared to a router 1watt.

What a lot of the so called jammers are using is a old exploit related to authentication messages. This has been around and known since the very early days of wifi encryption. . A very simple raspberry pi can be used to send these authentication messages. The police would have to sit around and hope to detect someone sending these messages.

This exploit has been fixed with the latest wifi security called WPA3.

The big problem is IOT type device which wifi cameras are a big part put ease of use over security. They are being sold to the consumer market who are so dumb they are very lucky to be able to take the device out the cardboard box. Almost all of these use what is called WPS to set it up. WPS is actually a worse security exposure than the authtentication attacks.

The WPS isssue is also fixed by WPA3 because it is not allowed. You now have the case where the dumb consumer market devices can not implement the security fixes because they are activaly using one of the security exposure.

Not much you are going to do about this. The police would have to actively sit around try to detect these wifi signals. If they were that close they would see the bad guys in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -Fran-
It's where the benefit of local storage comes in, like Kasa and Wyze products, even if the WiFi is knocked out it continues to record locally so as long as the camera itself isn't stolen you still have the footage, which can be said too about hardwired recorders and their DVRs.

But if you have that high end stuff, get a proper wall safe or keep it in a safe deposit box.
Obtaining the video after the robbery has been successful would not be as secure as a hard-wired notification during the robbery, correct?

Would it be possible for them to remove the camera(s)?
 
Unless it is a very high value target, messing with the cameras is too much work.
Yeah, and there's always the possibility of missing one or more.

So, they just wear hoods/hats and facemasks, at which point trying to find and take out all the cameras is just a waste of time that could result in them getting apprehended.
 
The FCC operates trucks and equipment for tracking down violators (like unlicensed/overpower HAM/CB operators and electromaniacs interfering with licensed transmissions)
Only if they get a complaint. They're not out and about like they would be in the 80s.

Even if they we're, there's lots more to monitor nowadays other than ham bands. 2.4ghz and 5ghz would be impossible to track a jammer unless they had a trap setup for a common occurrence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bit_user
Status
Not open for further replies.