LG's 31MU97 Monitor Has IPS Panel With 4096 x 2160 Resolution

[N.Broekhuijsen]

LG's latest 4K monitor has a 4096 x 2160 resolution and is aimed at professionals.

LG's 31MU97 Monitor Has IPS Panel With 4096 x 2160 Resolution : Read more

 

[MustSee4KTV]

Where are the 4K touch monitors?

 

[BulkZerker]

Wonder what kind of input lag it might have. Loving that its pushing display port use.

 

[Tanquen]

16:10 is much better than 17:9. Why would they go wider and not taller?

 

[gnarr]

because 4096*2160 is native DCI 4K resolution (and it's 19:10, not 17:9).

 

[soldier45]

Its over 30 inches its 4K and IPS with 60hz display port, I'm sold. Time to upgrade the ZR30.

 

[ammaross]

In other news, incident of organ harvesting has taken a sharp increase, particularly in technology-centric cities with a large IT workforce....

 

[sportfreak23]

Love the quality EA83 from LG's I have around the house. This may be my next upgrade when the time comes.

 

[Omar Josef]

No hardware calibration? So this isn't a professional monitor then. I wonder why it's taking so long for EIZO or NEC to finally start selling high resolution displays.

 

[tomfreak]

10bit per channel color + 4K = a true 4K monitor. (not those 24/32bit color)

lets hope they are also 60fps.

 

[flybri]

Hate to say it, but considering the new Apple iMac has a higher resolution display (and wouldn't doubt if it was better quality as well) AND it's also a computer as well for $2,500 (yes, I know it's a Mac, but still, it's a pretty capable one at that), then I feel $1,400 is too much at this point. Before that iMac came out, this wouldn't have been a bad price, but they'll have to knock at least $200 minimum off the cost for it to be worth it in my opinion. (Yes, I know the screen on the iMac is 4" smaller than this LG, but the iMac is still 27" and thus has a significantly higher ppi) Just my two cents.

 

[d_kuhn]

The problem with the retina iMac is that for $2400 you get a fantastic Display on a base model system ($500'ish PC price range)... the loaded retina iMac is a much more capable machine but then you're in for $4300 (less if you get some of the super expensive upgrades like memory and hdd yourself). For that kind of money you can have an IPS >30" 4k display and an x99 based machine that will wipe the floor with the iMac. I looked at the new iMac at the Apple store last week, the monitor deserves all the kudo's it's getting, it really is lovely... but it's also quite a bit smaller than my Asus PQ321... and visually it's not HUGELY better (biggest difference between the two other than size is that the iMac display was noticeably brighter and a bit crisper). I've been trying to choose between the loaded iMac and a fairly loaded 4k x99 machine, I'm leaning x99... I just have a hard time paying the same price for such a large performance differential.

 

[Nossy]

60hz or 30hz? I'm sold if it's 60.

 

[nukemaster]

Please be glow free then take my money.

 

[floob13]

The imac 5K does not have a wide gamut display - it covers only srgb - so is not comparable to this.