Rafiul27 :
Seanie280672 :
I agree with Trender, and as your looking for something to last 5 years plus, ryzen would be perfect, AMD say they will support the hardware for at least 4 years, Intel on the other hand are coming out with something new this year, and rest assured there will be something new next year which will then require a new motherboard because they decided to change the socket by 1 pin again, and within 2 years the 7700/7600 etc will be out of date.
i'd be looking at the ryzen7 1700 in that case.
was looking at the ryzen 5, but i think i'd rather get the 7 series for "future proofing". even from the benchmark videos i have seen, intel always does better regardless of ryzen's benchmark scores etc.
the other thing holding me back hugely is, AMD has always sucked with single core processing, games i play at the moment are more single core cpu demanding
is there anything very technical or innovative that ryzen does over kaby lake.. enlighten me or link me thanks
Bios updates are on there way to fix some things, AMD are currently working on a microcode AGENSA update which will allow RyZen to officially support 3600mhz memory, and some other things, yes I agree RyZen 7 single core performance isnt upto Intel standard, but the difference is like 8%, are you really going to notice that, the trouble is, everyone is comparing it to the 7700K, but it wasnt built to compete with that chip, it was built to keep up with the 6850K and 6900 series, Broadwell 6 and 10 core CPUs, and if you watch youtube video's based on that information, it does exactly that, even in some cases when Intel has the upper hand, dont forget these Intel chip run in quad channel memory where as RyZen is Dual channel, and still beats Intel. have a look at this, also be sure to check out the price for an average extra 8% performance :
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-6900K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X/3605vs3916
Even in multi threaded games, its not rubbish like people are making out, 60+fps I get in games I play at 1080p 60hz, do you need anymore than that ? im not running synthetic benchmarks, I actually playing games with MSI afterburner OSD running, real life, 4k and higher resolution is even better.
Here's som,ething to watch about after all the hype cooled down, very interesting watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylvdSnEbL50
If your just going to use it for gaming, then id agree and say you may as well get the 7700K, however, id also say, if your just going to be gaming, you might as well get a playstation or XBOX, but as your not, you're going to be using it for redering, then the 1700 is probably defo the better choice.
Someone also mentioned waiting for Canon lake, however, Intel already messed up canon lake, it was supposed to be 10nm architecture, but they can't get it right yet, so it's going to be 14nm, the same as kaby and sky lake, which means, hardly any performance gain, another money making scam, but then they will continue working on 10nm, and by the end of this year, possibly the beginning of next year, they'll release it, and canon, kaby and sky will be old school.
I'm by no way a fan boy of Intel or Amd, I just got fed up of intels tactics, every 6 to 9 months coming out with a new cpu, minimal changes, pretty much no noticeable changes for the average user, and then doing things like changing the socket by as little as 1 pin, so now you can't just change your cpu, you need a new motherboard too, twice this has happened in the last 3 or 4 years with Intel to what I know of.
Socket 1150 to 1151 and then socket the 1156 to 1155, really???
So now there's talk of Canon lake being another socket change, and then there 10nm will be yet another socket change, so now we're up to about 6 socket changes in 4 years, or you could just go with AM4 which Amd say they're going to support for 4 plus years, which means, if they bring out a new cpu in 2 years time and you feel like buying it, you won't need a new board, just a simple bios flash.