Looking for memory with Abit IC7 Max 3 board

[john]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

My old system is going to my son and I believe I'd like to build a
system with the Abit IC7 Max 3 board. My two previous Abit boards
never gave me problems so I'd like to stick with Abit.

My primary interest is in stability at this time. Looking at
Monarch Computer I am offered a range of memory options [that they
will test before shipping]. I'd like to get 512 meg of RAM at this
time and to do so with 2-256 meg chips. I have twice had memory chips
go bad on me. The first time was a single 512 chip and I was down for
almost a week. I managed to get 2 -256 to replace it and again lost a
chip but could keep running. Both chips were from Crucial Memory.

Here are the options from the drop-down window when I chose the
Abit IC7 Max 3 board:

DDR(266)2100 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 990997
DDR(333)2700 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-2700LLPT)
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-3200C2PT)
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-3200LLPT)
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991088
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991139
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991155
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ400512ELDC-K)
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ400512ELDCPE-K)
DDR(433)3500 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991090
DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ433512PFDC-K)
DDR(466)3700 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ466512PFDC-K)
DDR(500)4000 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-4000PT)
DDR(500)4000 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991128
DDR(533)4200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ533512PFDC-K)

Could someone please tell me what the best choice would likely be?

Thanks in advance,
John

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

Might want to look in your manual about "ESD".

Forrest

Motherboard Help By HAL web site:
http://home.comcast.net/~hal-9000/


On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:31:14 -0400, John <JohnSeanPotter@yahoo.com>
wrote:

< snip >

> I have twice had memory chips
>go bad on me.

< snip >

 

[TomG]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

I've had excellent results with Corsair on the IC7 series board... I've
used both XMS3500 at 5:4 and XMS4400 at 1:1

--

Thomas Geery
Network+ certified

ftp://geerynet.d2g.com
ftp://68.98.180.8 Abit Mirror <----- Cable modem IP
This IP is dynamic so it *could* change!...
over 130,000 FTP users served!
^^^^^^^




"John" <JohnSeanPotter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dqju805i1js30q6oefuc21uovnok8mfm0g@4ax.com...
> My old system is going to my son and I believe I'd like to build a
> system with the Abit IC7 Max 3 board. My two previous Abit boards
> never gave me problems so I'd like to stick with Abit.
>
> My primary interest is in stability at this time. Looking at
> Monarch Computer I am offered a range of memory options [that they
> will test before shipping]. I'd like to get 512 meg of RAM at this
> time and to do so with 2-256 meg chips. I have twice had memory chips
> go bad on me. The first time was a single 512 chip and I was down for
> almost a week. I managed to get 2 -256 to replace it and again lost a
> chip but could keep running. Both chips were from Crucial Memory.
>
> Here are the options from the drop-down window when I chose the
> Abit IC7 Max 3 board:
>
> DDR(266)2100 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 990997
> DDR(333)2700 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-2700LLPT)
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-3200C2PT)
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-3200LLPT)
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991088
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991139
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991155
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ400512ELDC-K)
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ400512ELDCPE-K)
> DDR(433)3500 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991090
> DDR(400)3200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ433512PFDC-K)
> DDR(466)3700 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ466512PFDC-K)
> DDR(500)4000 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Corsair XMS (TwinX512-4000PT)
> DDR(500)4000 - 512 [2 pcs 256] Muskin 991128
> DDR(533)4200 - 512 [2 pcs 256] OCZ (OCZ533512PFDC-K)
>
> Could someone please tell me what the best choice would likely be?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> John

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

Good day Mr. G,

Did you happen to benchmark the improvement in going to the 4400?

Forrest

Motherboard Help By HAL web site:
http://home.comcast.net/~hal-9000/


On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:32:03 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
wrote:

>I've had excellent results with Corsair on the IC7 series board... I've
>used both XMS3500 at 5:4 and XMS4400 at 1:1

 

[TomG]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

yeah, got a fair increase, went from the low 5100's to the 5800's in Sandra
2K4 and I know I have plenty of ram overhead at this stage. as it is, the
CPU isn't happy going much higher unless I find a better way to cool it.
it's stable when I go higher with it but I start to get on the warm side and
that's even with a Zalman CNPS7000CU cooler. some heat starts building up
in the case even with a bunch of case cooling going on and that just tells
me that I'm really putting off some wattage... normally, I don't have a
heat build-up problem... had to raise the core voltage a little to get it
to go higher and that, of course, is a contributing factor. currently at
247 yielding a little over 3450 on a 2.8c so not so bad...

--

Thomas Geery
Network+ certified

ftp://geerynet.d2g.com
ftp://68.98.180.8 Abit Mirror <----- Cable modem IP
This IP is dynamic so it *could* change!...
over 130,000 FTP users served!
^^^^^^^




"- HAL9000" <gumpy@mail.org> wrote in message
news:v33190192arp68udmblht660vasv5rv0h8@4ax.com...
> Good day Mr. G,
>
> Did you happen to benchmark the improvement in going to the 4400?
>
> Forrest
>
> Motherboard Help By HAL web site:
> http://home.comcast.net/~hal-9000/
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:32:03 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >I've had excellent results with Corsair on the IC7 series board... I've
> >used both XMS3500 at 5:4 and XMS4400 at 1:1
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

TomG wrote:
> yeah, got a fair increase, went from the low 5100's to the 5800's in Sandra
....snip...

Wow! An Outstanding tome.

I had no idea that mamary units would generate that much heat.
HMmmmm.

🙂
Qed.

 

[TomG]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

we be talking about bandwidth, here ya goof! and MEMORY not mammary! and
yes, a good pair of mammaries DO generate heat!

--

Thomas Geery
Network+ certified

ftp://geerynet.d2g.com
ftp://68.98.180.8 Abit Mirror <----- Cable modem IP
This IP is dynamic so it *could* change!...
over 130,000 FTP users served!
^^^^^^^




"0_Qed" <nano.bot@shaysnet.com> wrote in message
news:4090FB4D.1868@shaysnet.com...
> TomG wrote:
> > yeah, got a fair increase, went from the low 5100's to the 5800's in
Sandra
> ...snip...
>
> Wow! An Outstanding tome.
>
> I had no idea that mamary units would generate that much heat.
> HMmmmm.
>
> 🙂
> Qed.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

5800s... one thing for sure, intel has an amazing memory interface
compared to amd. That's 2.1 times my 187 fsb athlon setup.

Hmmm, ok. I had not realized the current state of the art was hitting
the power dissipation wall so hard. I wonder if they will ever start
directly coupling the cpu heatsink to the case. A 6 by 10 plate could
dissipate a lot of heat.

Forrest

Motherboard Help By HAL web site:
http://home.comcast.net/~hal-9000/


On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:21:06 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
wrote:

>yeah, got a fair increase, went from the low 5100's to the 5800's in Sandra
>2K4 and I know I have plenty of ram overhead at this stage. as it is, the
>CPU isn't happy going much higher unless I find a better way to cool it.
>it's stable when I go higher with it but I start to get on the warm side and
>that's even with a Zalman CNPS7000CU cooler. some heat starts building up
>in the case even with a bunch of case cooling going on and that just tells
>me that I'm really putting off some wattage... normally, I don't have a
>heat build-up problem... had to raise the core voltage a little to get it
>to go higher and that, of course, is a contributing factor. currently at
>247 yielding a little over 3450 on a 2.8c so not so bad...

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

- HAL9000 wrote:
> 5800s... one thing for sure, intel has an amazing memory interface
> compared to amd. That's 2.1 times my 187 fsb athlon setup.

They have to have that, since their processors are more dependant on
high memory bandwidth, than AMD's.

> Hmmm, ok. I had not realized the current state of the art was hitting
> the power dissipation wall so hard. I wonder if they will ever start
> directly coupling the cpu heatsink to the case. A 6 by 10 plate could
> dissipate a lot of heat.

I've had the same thought, but the issue is the coresize - there are
no materials (except diamond), which will dissipate hundreds of Watt
of heat from a core that small (usually ~100 mm²), and still keep the
core at a reasonable temperature.

Besides, there needs to be a layer of iron(-alloy) to lower EMI
emission, somewhere between the CPU and the outside of the case.