Question Lower r23 score after disabling turbo boost ?

Jul 16, 2022
97
8
35
I have a Asus ROG STRIX G17

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
GPU: RTX 3050

It used to stay around 55 degrees idle and it's r23 score was about 13740...
I disable turbo boost and now it mostly stays under 49 during idle but it's score goes below 9700....
I have not tested any games yet and I don't know whether this is a valid test....
So is this something I should care about....
I can provide other specifications anyone wants...
 

DSzymborski

Curmudgeon Pursuivant
Moderator
I have a Asus ROG STRIX G17

Cpu: AMD R7 6800H
Gpu: RTX 3050

It used to stay around 55 degrees idle and it's r23 score was about 13740...
I disable turbo boost and now it mostly stays under 49 during idle but it's score goes below 9700....
I have not tested any games yet and I don't know whether this is a valid test....
So is this something I should care about....
I can provide other specifications anyone wants...

Only you can tell if the real-world impact on your use from basically downgrading your CPU is worth the lower temperatures (and it's load temperature that matters; idle temperature is fairly meaningless unless it's an idle temperature that indicates a malfunctioning cooling solution).
 
Yes yes ...
The scores look about about right, it means the CPU will run at 3.2Ghz under load. I can understand why you might do this, I would expect it to be a lot cooler and quieter. In terms of what impact it might have on your gaming, your most likely to notice if your playing at high refresh rates like 144hz. I don't think you'd notice anywhere else, even at 3.2Ghz it's still a powerful CPU. Your far more likely in my opinion to find the 3050 holding back the CPU than the other way around.
 
Jul 16, 2022
97
8
35
The scores look about about right, it means the CPU will run at 3.2Ghz under load. I can understand why you might do this, I would expect it to be a lot cooler and quieter. In terms of what impact it might have on your gaming, your most likely to notice if your playing at high refresh rates like 144hz. I don't think you'd notice anywhere else, even at 3.2Ghz it's still a powerful CPU. Your far more likely in my opinion to find the 3050 holding back the CPU than the other way around.
I got an idea...
I set up a power plan for silent and a power plan for performance separately
The scores were
Silent: 9765
Turbo: 13995
This can satisfy both my usage (Gaming and Editing as well as regular use)
What's yall opinion?