Mayday Call

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:49:43 -0700, Jay Beckman wrote:

> This is exactly the point...there is NOTHING for your eyes to trust. You
> fall back on what you are feeling in the seat of your pants BUT you can be
> in an unusual attitude (and descending) and all the while you won't feel any
> different than when you are in straight and level flight.

I gave that a test last night by sticking the 172 in a dense storm, at
night, at 13000 ft and hand-flying it right above KSEA.
For the extra effect I turned off the NAV lights, which also turned off the
panel lights too. I had next close to 0 visibility.
I was fighting to stay level.

As I was concentrating on where I was on the gps I looked at the
instruments and soon noticed that the plane was banking to the right.
I corrected it, held the yoke firmly, looked at the gps again and glanced
back at the gauges....it was banking again. The wind was pushing me
sideways.

Now of course there's no real way to simulate these dangers because we have
no "seat of your pants" feel, but it was difficult enough.


> When I took my PP-ASEL checkride, during the "under the hood" phase, the DPE
> had *the most* amazing touch flying the plane into attitudes that I was sure
> were one thing, but when I'd pick my head up and scan the instruments, we
> were "180 degrees" in the opposite situation.
>
> I was sure we were in a left wing low climb (and I was primed to shove the
> nose down and add power...), but damned if we weren't right wing low and
> screaming toward the ground (which called for immeadiately chopping the
> power, rolling wings level and gently pulling out into level flight.) It
> took a second or two (and probably longer...) to make the mental switch from
> what I felt to what I saw via the instruments.

This is all so difficult for me to understand since I'm used to "listening"
to my body in normal, on the ground situations.
I can't help but think that my body would tell me when and how I was
banking or whether I was right-side up or upside-down.

Hmmmm....

--

Marcel (SAG-21)
(Gear up, AP engaged...hey...what's that emergency light?)
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

"Beech45Whiskey"
> to deploy the BRS, but it merely ripped off the top of the aircraft and
the
> aircraft crashed into the ground, killing the sole occupant.

Very Wile E. Coyotesque.

Sorry.

It's funny you hear how much safer flying is compared to driving. Then as
you become interested, you see all the hundreds of accidents and realize
it's really not that safe.


Dallas
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

stevem wrote:
> "Marcel Kuijper" <zoepetier_nothing_here@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1grmcgrwe3y8u.8pyqjyjs5nw3.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:49:14 -0500, CRaSH wrote:
>>
>>> And you're usually in the middle of a busy intersection, or
>>> entering a "round a bout" when this feeling of utter stupidity
>>> strikes!! =(8-0)))))))))))))))
>>
>> I think it's just outside of London where they have a large
>> round-a-bout with a whole bunch of little round-a-bouts inside of it.
>> And the Brits are the only people in the world who know how it
>> works. 🙂 --
>>
>> Marcel (SAG-21)
>> (Chance favours the prepared mind.)
> Marcel,
> If you're referring to the roundabout at Hemel Hempstead (and I think
> you are), what makes you think even us Brits know how it works??? I
> remember my own immediate reaction when I first came upon it (Help!
> I'm on a roundabout, why is there traffic coming straight at me??)!
> Regards,
> Steve.

There's another one in Swindon (Wiltshire)...my first experience of it was
on my police driving course. Apparently it works very well when you get used
to it.

Tim
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

Marcel Kuijper wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:49:43 -0700, Jay Beckman wrote:
<snip>
> This is all so difficult for me to understand since I'm used to
> "listening" to my body in normal, on the ground situations.
> I can't help but think that my body would tell me when and how I was
> banking or whether I was right-side up or upside-down.
>
> Hmmmm....

Don't you believe it! As for one of the other posters, when I did a
simulated IMC flight (funnily enough, it was real IMC at the time, so I
didn't need the hoods), my instructor got me to close my eyes then put the
aircraft into a certain attitude and then told me to open my eyes and
recover. I was convinced that we were flying straight and level (trusted my
senses rather than the instruments) right up to the point where we broke out
of the bottom of the cloud in a right bank only a few hundred feet (or so it
seemed!) over the Irish Sea. Next time around, I decided to trust the
instruments...hammers home the importance of pre-flight checks too.

Tim
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:42:04 GMT, stevem wrote:

> If you're referring to the roundabout at Hemel Hempstead (and I think you
> are), what makes you think even us Brits know how it works??? I remember my
> own immediate reaction when I first came upon it (Help! I'm on a roundabout,
> why is there traffic coming straight at me??)!

That's the one, Steve. The "Magic" roundabout.
http://www.hemelweb.demon.co.uk/history.htm

I had myself a good look and no matter how I look at it or how long, I just
can't see what good it does. If anything it's a frustrating invention, it's
more complicated than a woman's mind, it's dangerous and it's stupid!
Not to mention that it probably takes a person three times as long to get
where he/she is going, which means that a car or motorcycle spews toxic
gasses three times longer than we would want and that of course means it's
really bad for the environment and our bank-accounts.

Whomever thought that thing up should be sentenced to 120 hours of Ethel
Merman!

--

Marcel (SAG-21)
(There's no such thing as a natural-born pilot. - Chuck Yeager)
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:52:27 GMT, Dallas wrote:

> "Marcel Kuijper"
>> I think it's just outside of London where they have a large round-a-bout
>
> I Canada, wouldn't you call it a round-a-boot?

No. In Canada it would be called "we're going round in circles, eh?"

--

Marcel (SAG-21)
(It's a NIGHTMAAAARE!!! - C3PO)