Memory speeds and triple monitor setup.

[repinsz]

After doing a bunch of research, I will probably get the answer I already assume.

The question: I run a triple screen setup. I use all 3 monitors majority of the time, i.e internet, plus streams on top of gaming. I run 4x4 1600 mhz HyperX on a quad channel (2011 socket). Would it be worth bumping up to 2133 or 2400 with todays gaming? Would I notice an increase in performance, or is it a waste of money? Right now, I don't see a point in going overboard with ddr4.

My setup runs a 3GB EVGA GTX 780 SC and a Core i7-3820 3.6 gz, OC'd to 4.4 gz. but feel like my performance is off even without running anything on additional monitors. No temp problems (btw)

 

[computertech82]

Here, on tom's there has been many test/benchmarks on memory, about zero difference between them, including the timing.

 

[Tradesman1]

Sounds like 16GB is sufficient and don't hear anything that's overly DRAM intensive where faster would improve things

 

[Vic 40]

Right now, I don't see a point in going overboard with ddr4.

Would mean a new cpu+mobo too,no reason for that.

My setup runs a 3GB EVGA GTX 780 SC and a Core i7-3820 3.6 gz, OC'd to 4.4 gz. but feel like my performance is off even without running anything on additional monitors. No temp problems (btw)

What do you mean? "Feel " ... Compared benchmarks?->reviews.