[citation][nom]Tomfreak[/nom]Skyrim already prove that being single player only can still sell pretty well. Too bad those scums like EA/Activision Blizzard still think bringing/converting single player game ex.Simcity/Diablo3 to always online/multiplayer can boost sales combat piracy.[/citation]
EA has a guy who brags that he will never green light ANYTHING unless it has multiplayer in it.
[citation][nom]ojas[/nom]I think you'll have to ask nvidia/amd for that[/citation]
as its coded now? yea, ea and amd, im willing to bet they could fake alot of graphical effect, come out with a game that looks almost identical, but runs just fine on at max in even a mid range card.
[citation][nom]Onikage[/nom]Great News Indeed !! Single player is the way to go! even in our times.but wait a second , didnt Cevat Yerli(Crytek) said that Crysis 3 will melt our PC's ??Yeah well Yerli ,get in line, cause Metro LL will turn our PC's into dust first !Hope my7970 GE will survive Metro LL[/citation]
between metro and crysis... from what i can tell, they optimized the hell out of cry engine, from the pathetic crysis 1, to each game looking better and requiring the same if not less hardware at higher settings.
i think that crysis is going to be screwing around with water physics, and that runs like hell on every gpu/cpu right now. ill give the over all graphical nod to crysis 3 for this one, mostly because i have seen what their engine can do through tech demos and in game thech demos, where as metro... i dont see the in game tech demos for it.
---------------------
now, more to the article... didnt most people call the end of days when diablo 3 launched without pvp?
lets forget the game has little to offer even on a good day, but this was pre launch you had people saying its dead to them over no pvp...
why does this get a pass?
is the story that engaging? because from what i remember metro was, and is still known as a tech demo game, i never heard it being a good game on its own right.