[citation][nom]nebun[/nom]the only reason why dell is still in business is because of the US Military....well now they've switched to HP...let's see how long they will survive now, lol....DELL=CRAP[/citation]
I really disagree. Their business level equipment is top of the line and supported well. Their servers are well designed, easy to work on and with, very reliable, and performs very well. I like their networking equipment far, FAR better than Cisco's crap. (Who forces such an arcane command line interface on their customers? Cisco is so absolutely HORRID to work with.) It even performs better than Cisco's equal equipment, and Dell doesn't use some legalese crap to keep people from publishing benchmarks or reselling older equipment, nor do they snag you with the basic equipment price being near equal and then super-overcharge for the little things. (Dell 10Gb SFPs are $190 each while Cisco charges over $1000 each. Sure, Cisco's switches are cheaper on their own, but when you have 24 SFPs to buy with it, that price suddenly becomes a lot different.)
Their direct consumer level equipment does have some issues, but it's far better than HP.
With my experience with HP server equipment, and especially their software support, I really do wonder how HP is still in business. We have 4 times as many Dell servers, and I've had to call hardware support for the HP stuff twice as often. On top of that, I sprung for a 27" monitor and stupidly bought an HP (ZR2740w) because it was $200 cheaper. The first one was DOA and the second died after 9 days, but I'm stuck with this model unless I pay a 10% restocking fee.
Then there's my experience with HP's HP-UX systems. that's a nightmare I wouldn't want to stick anyone with. Believe me, the military's decision to go with those systems has nothing to do with reliability, usability, supportability, or performance. It might be security, but I really hate the idea of using obscurity as a security model.