velosteraptor :
They finally bring back the start button, and everyone finds something else to complain about.
It's just a button which leads back to the start screen. It's not a button that users want, it's just the Windows 7 UI with the Windows 8 performance tweaks that users want.
thor220 :
To everyone here:
Microsoft is bringing back the start button but NOT the start menu. Instead when you click on the start button it will bring up the metro interface. It's a sneaky move by microsoft to try and gather some support, it's quite disgusting.
To all the windows 8 supporters:
Windows 8 might be a decent OS but the company behind it is going in the wrong direction. If they can't even bring back the start button without a huge caveat, what faith should professionals have in microsoft to use their system for work? I can't believe that microsoft continues to spit in the face of the largest purchaser of their OS, business.
+1 here. But 8.1 is just an extension of Windows 8. They're not going to change the UI overall to make Windows 7 users happy so all they could really do is add a start button, but with the amount of Win 8 haters already the usage numbers will still be fairly slow climbing and while 8.1 will fix most of the bugs 8 has and it'll be an improved version of Windows 8, i doubt it's going to give full positive reviews like Windows 7. 8.1 certainly doesn't change my mind on how i feel about Windows 8.
SirGCal :
Because we had Windows 7 almost perfect; we wanted to mess it all up and start from scratch all over again and prove we can talk ourselves out of any hole.
That's what I see when I see Windows 8 advertisements anymore... From the administration side of things, it's too much of a headache. I'm not even talking about the start button, metro, etc. Honestly I'm surprised they're back-stepping on Metro at this point. Now if they add back in the other features they ripped out...
But I do agree with the others out there... Like I'm going to make my $3500 rig a picture frame or added more music stuff I don't use or new IE crap I'll NEVER use (why use a W3C non-compliant browser, I'll never understand... Ironically, I posted a new video to youtube and a friend running IE on W8 couldn't see it... Go figure. )
But why in the heck they have to turn windows into the app-store factory doesn't make any sense to... Oh wait... M$ greed... Android and Apple and even steam has an app-store, we want one too!!! We want to do data-mining now also on your PCs and sell that too! Never mind, figured it out for myself...
I use my PC for gaming, video editing and i do all that using a keyboard and a mouse. Don't get me wrong i like my Android phone for the convenience of having it while i'm on break at work or i need a gps for a location somewhere but when i am at home i'm not going to kid myself that touch UI is better than a desktop. You look at the usage numbers and you see that there is a majority of users on XP and Windows 7. If we really were moving to tablet UI's Android and Windows 8 would have a much higher spot on the usage survey. Windows 8, the cloud and tablets are hyped up but is there a profound change? No, in fact a good number of Windows users are not even aware of Linux or they have heard the name but haven't done any research or took one look at it and found it 'difficult to comprehend' which is with the case with Windows 8. The only good thing that i saw with Windows 8 is there are tablet/laptop hybrids which i think will eventually merge for those who have trouble deciding on a tablet or a laptop.
pocketdrummer :
They just don't get it, do they?
We want an OS that works well with a mouse and keyboard so we can get actual work done. The BUTTON itself doesn't matter. It's not a problem to use a hot-corner. The problem is that clicking the start "button" rips you from your workflow and wastes screen space in the sake of looking "modern". It offers no tangible benefits to anyone who uses their computer for work.
The metro UI needs to be redesigned for PCs. Take a look at Start8 from stardock (hell, hire them to do it for you). They've already come out with solutions to problems that should have never made it to release.
Also, figure out how to make things work WITHOUT swipe gestures. It has no place on a computer with a mouse. It's slow and its uncomfortably foreign in a desktop environment. This is something a user will learn to cope with, but never something that will feel right for the platform.
It looks like Microsoft missed the mark... again.
I guess we'll have to wait for 8.2 or 9 for a decent desktop environment.
All i really care about is having a desktop on my desktop or laptop computer. In about 10 years i might get one of those tablet/laptop hybrids but for now i don't really need one until i need to replace my laptop and even then i'll probably get a used laptop running current hardware/software.
I really like Windows 7 and MS has done an amazing job of improving the Windows experience for me. With 8 it's just another OS to me and while of course i can customise it to make it look and function like Windows 7 it's just not in the budget and 7 works plenty good for me. In fact i am not expecting much out of MS to return 'Windows 7" and MS has a way of forcing new, insufficient tweaks with the new OS's, despite me thinking this metro/start screen nonsense will go away it'll probably still rear it's ugly head in Windows 9, maybe less intrusive, but i'll be there stalking. I myself is going to be using Linux if Windows 7 doesn't pan out past it's expired date and avoid using any new MS OS unless it's profoundly better than Windows 8.
Hanin33 :
I believe those that say we should just get over it and get used to the change have never had to support hundreds of users on a daily basis. I believe those that would say the Windows Store is useful to businesses, the core of the Windows Licensing scheme, have never actually worked IT in a business with more than a handful of users. Touch interface for Excel spreadsheets? Touch interface for CAD/CAM or GIS? Touch interface for word processing? When did the OS stop being just the layer that that brought your hardware together and allowed you to decide where you go from there?
Exactly, Windows 8 users don't understand that a good number of users have a hard time using a computer at all and the "you shouldn't use a PC if you're not technically adept" is silly. Not everyone is capable of everything otherwise every one would be a police officer, a scientist or a doctor. Granted some users just don't want to learn how it works, they just replay the "i don't know it works" and no one is asking you to be a 'MacGyver' at computers but when you can't be MacGyver there's tutorials and other resources at your disposal.
Other than bringing touch to desktops and having difference in an OS for the sake of having difference along with having money revenue for modern apps there really isn't anything innovative about Windows 8. Essentially it's just turning your desktop into a tablet. While the desktop still exists in Windows 8, the changes are profound and it changes the desktop experience users had with Windows 8.
And going back to users not being able to adapt to Windows 8, that they can simply download software to restore what little Windows 7 MS left alone in Windows 8 you still have to tell users that and not just tell them that they are too handicapped to use a computer. My problem with Windows 8 besides the UI is the vision that MS has for Windows, what will they do with the newest Windows? Will they eliminate the desktop? I'm glad they haven't done that already but besides that what was so wrong with the desktop that 'needed to be changed'. Again i think Windows 8 is just something for those who just want change for the sake of change.
For me computers are a tool, not a toy where you can change the gears around on it or make it look more fancy, all i want is an OS that is stable and one where i don't need to change everything the way i had it with the previous version of Windows. I can't tell you how many times i asked for simplicity in OS upgrades. And pretty much i don't need a fancy UI or a different look every time one of my OS's go out of style. I just want to be able to do the things i need to on a computer without having to relearn everything. I was fine with learning how my Android phone works because it's a 'new device'. My desktop is not a new device, it's something when i need to replace it due to lack of hardware requirements or a dead PC. But when i need to replace my desktop i expect to get familiarity, not a game of 'Where's Waldo'. And yes while i can learn a different UI, it's more of the wanting to learn it and whether the new UI is any good. And there are plenty of users out there who just need to get stuff done.
On another note, the company i work for recently upgraded from XP to Windows 7 and some workers are struggling or finding it annoying. Really it's the same thing. Windows 8 is not the same thing. Sure you got a desktop and with 8.1 there's a start button, but again it's not going to fix the problem that users have with Windows 8 and that's familiarity. After a friend telling me he never uses the start menu i asked him how do you shut your computer down, THE START MENU. What's the first thing you use when installing a new copy of Windows, THE START MENU. So unless you have some crazy way of using your computer without ever, ever using the start menu you need it! And the start screen besides having a similar function to the start menu it's different and that's what has users stuck on! So i don't think the new UI is going to fly by it's not going to have a profound difference (other than the hype) and if that was the case then Linux would have already taken over Windows. The only difference is Windows 8 is in front of our face and it's taking quite a bit of backlash already.
Try replacing a users Windows desktop for a Linux or iOS, you think they are simply going to deal with the changes? Well maybe a bit more so because there's a desktop familiarity but overall changing the UI with millions of users used to doing things a certain way won't want to deal with the changes.