Microsoft Now Recruiting for Windows 8

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
Obviously, the job listing indicates that Microsoft may be gearing up to develop Windows 8 despite version 7 just now hitting store shelves last month.
Click to expand...

That should read because of course - the old version is done so the majority of the team moves to the next version. In fact, this team migration has probably started a while ago...
 
wow this is getting ridiculous, I hate constantly having to change my OS. Please just let me live a while with windows 7.
 
Takes a long time to develop an OS. Of course they're gonna start now. A majority moves on to the next thing. Others will update 7 until 8 comes out. Same with anything else. Car manufacturers crank out new models every year.
 
[citation][nom]yang[/nom]wow this is getting ridiculous, I hate constantly having to change my OS. Please just let me live a while with windows 7.[/citation]

Its not like they force you to update
 
Hopefully there will be a 128bit version, and am sure AMD will be the 1st out with a 128bit cpu just like they were with the 64bit.
 
Hopefully there will be a 128bit version, and am sure AMD will be the 1st out with a 128bit cpu just like they were with the 64bit.
 
I doubt 8 will have a 128bit version. The only application for such a high memory bandwidth would be in the server sector which I would expect in Windows Server 2012 (the windows that will divide by zero and end the world).
 
[citation][nom]Netherscourge[/nom]Why not jump to 128-bit? It'll give CPU maufacturers something new to aim for.[/citation]

we are many years (even several decades) away from needing a 128-bit OS. the only applications of such software today is in supercomputers. an OS like that will only give home computers a loss of performance due to an increase of instruction size. realize that a jump from 32 bit to 64 bit is nothing like 64 to 128.

by the way, a 32bit OS can take a maximum of 3.3 gigs of ram and a 64 bit takes a maximum of 16.8 million terabytes (16 exabytes). because the motherboard RAM limit is currently 12 gigs, i don't think microsoft is planning to release a PC 128bit OS any time soon.
 
[citation][nom]Netherscourge[/nom]Why not jump to 128-bit? It'll give CPU maufacturers something new to aim for.[/citation]

Windows 7 cant use all of the theoretical maximum RAM 64-bit can address. There is still lots (and I mean LOTS) of headroom, why make a jump so prematurely? Lets let 64-bit become standard first.
 
128 bit would be useful for DAW's a higher bit rate means more headroom, but a 128 bit CPU and OS probably won't come for quite awhile seeing as 64 bit is really just now transitioning into mainstream acceptance
 
There was already an article linking to comments made by a Windows developer about him working on 128bit parts of Windows 8. 128 bit is a good possibility for Windows 8.
 
Honestly I think we will hit 128 bit hardware sooner than people think, and you do not need to max out a few terabytes of ram to take advantage of 128bit computing power.
 
Windows 7 is OK. Believe it or not, there's an instance or two I found which I prefer Windows Vista. Maybe I just need to make a theme change or something. Microsoft should just stop while they're ahead for now. Windows 7 is great. Maybe offer DX12 compatibility when it comes out as an update.
 
[citation][nom]knowom[/nom]128 bit would be useful for DAW's a higher bit rate means more headroom, but a 128 bit CPU and OS probably won't come for quite awhile seeing as 64 bit is really just now transitioning into mainstream acceptance[/citation]

Knowing what you're talking about... FAIL
 
[citation][nom]apache_lives[/nom]64-bit only please, for got sake.[/citation]

There are still areas where a 32-bit version of Windows is needed and justified, with netbooks being the most obvious example. This will likely be the case even by the time Windows 8 is ready for release. It makes sense that they would develop both 32 and 64 bit versions if they can sell both.

What we need is not for Microsoft to stop developing 32-bit platforms, but for OEMs to stop selling 32-bit Windows on desktops and laptops. We're starting to see that now, with many home systems utilizing four gigabytes or more, but there are still many manufacturers that seem to be resisting.

We're four years behind schedule, but it looks like we may finally be getting there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom