Microsoft Wants Windows 7 Users to Upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you look from Vista's perspective, perhaps everything is 'enhanced'.
From XP's point of view there's little enhanced about windows 7.
XP has a smaller footprint, will be (just like Windows 98se today)hacked, and attacked less, and still has a faster response time.

And my notebook battery with Norton 360 installed lasts longer on XP, than a clean installation of windows 7!

I certainly hope Windows 7 allows going back to the grey 2000/Me/9X/NT look! It saves speed, and resources!
 
I don't get it! I have the feeling that MS is trying to bit Linux in number of distributions!

ps. Please accept my apology. I just could not hold it any more.
 
[citation][nom]ProDigit80[/nom]I certainly hope Windows 7 allows going back to the grey 2000/Me/9X/NT look! It saves speed, and resources![/citation]
Can you disable services?

In XP for example... just disable "themes" in services. I am sure Win7 will allow this as well.
 
I don't get it, haven't they learned anything? Just release 1 OS at a decent price and have it customizable at install or OEM can do a base for the hardware they are installing it on. Micro you are right you have an opportunity here and you are going to blow it.
 
Basically fits my view of all these companies. They want money each and every time you touch, see, hear, smell or taste a digital product. Look at Bill Gates' previous talking points of where he wanted to take Microsoft. The end game for Microsoft was/is it to be a rented OS. You buy nothing when you get the product, you just get a rental contract. Pay by the minute, hour, day, week, month, year. The endgame is basically, if you want to use your computer, we have the key, and we will allow you to use it, for a fee.

Same goes for movie, music and game industry, they are all going towards the pay per play. Buy a CD and they claim you do not own anything, if you want it on your iPod pay iTunes, want it on your computer, pay someone else, want it on some other mp3 player, another fee, in your car, pay a fee, their end goal is to charge you every time you hear more than ten consecutive seconds of anything remotely similar to something they can claim copyright to. These companies are nothing better than a buch of socialist parasites when it comes to how they see their products, as a way to enslave people to their company products. The time when you could simply buy something, and not have to worry about it is coming to an end.

All you younger kids with your anti piracy rants can rant on all you want, but when you let these companies lock you into pay per play for every single small thing in your life, your life will be very much a rat race of trying to keep up on all those nickles and dimes($1, $14.99, $29.99). They may seem like small numbers, but as the companies multiply the number of pay per play items in your supposedly can't live without catagories, your future incomes are going to start looking very small compared to your parent's income of years past. Of course, I guess you could just as well join them, and maybe make money.
 
I'll pass. When I see the need to move to a new OS, it will be open source. Wake up and smell the roses Microsoft.
 
So, What version of windows will i be getting again? I mean all these versions are so very very confusing. I upgraded OSX Tiger to Leopard and had no problem because there was 1 version, and that version contained all the updates with nothing left out.

What should i do for windows? do i buy the basic, get the premium do the ultimate or settle for the Starter Edition? Wow it's no wonder people switch to Linux. Locking out features? never heard of such a pyramid strategy. and here the piracy rate of windows is through the roof!

Do we own operating systems or do we lease or rent them? Apparently when it comes to software, we don't own anything
 
[citation][nom]Kingssman[/nom]So, What version of windows will i be getting again? I mean all these versions are so very very confusing. I upgraded OSX Tiger to Leopard and had no problem because there was 1 version, and that version contained all the updates with nothing left out.What should i do for windows? do i buy the basic, get the premium do the ultimate or settle for the Starter Edition? Wow it's no wonder people switch to Linux. Locking out features? never heard of such a pyramid strategy. and here the piracy rate of windows is through the roof! Do we own operating systems or do we lease or rent them? Apparently when it comes to software, we don't own anything[/citation]
u shouldnt buy any windows at all!

ms r playing their cards right tho, becoz most ppl want windows on their netbooks. personally i prefer a linux distro becoz, but for ur average person, they expect to have windows. it's good to c ms' marketshare go down but it's still ridiculously high
 
You people are all crazy. I actually love Vista Basic SP2 and think Windows 7 is completely awesome. It fixed all my gripes with Vista (note: I'll always hve a few gripes, nothing is perfect).

You bashers can go play on Linux, I'll get some actual work and gaming done on Windows thank you very much. I think MS is a pretty good company, I'm proud they are an American company.
 
I see lots of people talking about windows vista and 7 are not suitable to use on netbooks. well, i think this people didn't even tried to install the system. i have a msi wind running windows vista ultimate and its running pretty fast. some apps that are extreme hardware dependent (like winrar or games) run better in xp than in vista, but the system itself (opening windows/programs, switching programs) is much more faster in vista than in xp in my wind.
in windows xp i used the 98 theme, when in vista i use the full aero theme.
there is a thread in the msi wind forums with other users saying the same thing.
http://forums.msiwind.net/windows/windows-vista-perfect-ram-wind-t3898.html
i would really apreciate if tomshardware do a test with the two system in msi wind u100 or a similar netbook. forgive my poor english, i'm from brazil
 
WOW Let me know when linux has even 10% of the desktop share and you may have a chance. What alot of you 1337 DUD3'5 dont get is that while there are different versions of windows THEY ALL RUN THE SAME SOFTWARE. office 97 Still works on vista. My 3d software works on everything from 98 to W7. It just works. My grandmother and parents can call with a question and I can rattle the answear off without pause. Walmart tried to sell linux based machines and it was a disaster. People think it was because the lindows windows link. BAAA wallmart could have done what they wanted but the sales were just sad.
AS far as OSX PLEASE. Your drinking the coolaid if you think for one sec that Apple is somesort of white knight. In many ways Apple is MORE evil then M$.
 
Wait, wait, I love vista and look forward to Windows 7. I plan on purchasing Premium or Ultimate when the time comes; but what does this mean by 3-program max?
That's a bit odd to say the least, if it literally implies I can only run three programs with GUI's simultaneously (I must be mistaken). Any way I look at this, it's somewhat disheartening.
 
*Note*
Totally agree with everything m3kt3k said. I have a place for Linux in my Heart, but don't take your feeling of supremacy being a Linux user out on M$; they have different places in the tech world.
 
@ 2gooDrumr

the 3 programs max restriction are only found on the Windows 7 starter edition, since you're going for either Premium or Ultimate, this is not a problem.
 
I use Linux and all versions of Windows. I hate and love them all equally.
Any and all OS' likes to be a serious pain in the ass to get right,but once you get it to do what you want it should be alright(example : Vista and Ubuntu)
 
I didn't say anything bad about windows as an OS. I just dislike the fact that they bundle everything together and then only unlock what you pay for. That is crap. I'd like a stripped down version that has all of the necessities and nothing extra. They're always dropping simple, but useful features from the lower end versions (notably networking options), but including all of the fancy frivolous crap (WMP, etc) in all of the versions.
 
[citation][nom]twburger[/nom]Microsoft is dead, long live Linux, OSX, BSD, Haiku, ...[/citation]
AGREE!!!!!!!

[citation][nom]gm0n3y[/nom]Does M$ really want everyone to pirate?[/citation]
AGREE!!!!!!!
 
I'm getting tired of the MicroSHAFT, they are nickle and dimming everyone and over price their bloated, buggy, and boring OS.

Now that I've made my order for the FragFX v2 on the PS3...ummm, tell me why again I need windblows?

I was a supporter of theirs for a long time, but I've about had it with their greed and buggy products. In these financial times we are in...they seem as out of touch with the consumer as ever.

They want me back? Buy back crappy Vista and I'll "consider" buying windows 7, if not...Unbuntu here I come (I'm already playing with it and it gets the job done).
 
So, now the OS that comes with the computer is truly crippleware. Three programs at a time? I might as well install a pirate copy of DOS on my netbook.
 
Windows 7 is great. What you people don't like choice? Can't handle multiple options on what to buy? Choice...why is that bad?

Linux is a great OS for people who like Linux. Windows is a good OS for people who actually wanna get their s**t done.
 
I would've suggested that rather than impose limits such as 3 simultaneous apps, they should completely remove "enhancements" such as indexing, DRM (for Blu-ray playback, etc.), Windows Desktop Search, etc. But then again, if that was the case, no doubt a lot of people would stick to starter edition 😀
 
Status
Not open for further replies.