purple_dragon
Distinguished
Windows 10 EOL...So much for the last Windows ever. Just say no to recall.
What is there "completely different"?Win11 is a completely different kernel with scheduling for heterogeneous cores that Win10 can't do with the same efficiency.
There are OS plugins/services that Microsoft could ask the consumer to pay a monthly/yearly subscription for. An example could be a Supreme Windows version that would include additional plugins (such as an advanced AI) and services (such as ad free) . A standard version, with ads that can't be disabled, would be for free.People said that about Win 10, literally from Day 1.
They had it on 'good authority' that an install would last only 30 days, then go directly to a paid model.
No chrome OS should never ever be suggested if you dislike Microsoft for its practicesI still have an i5-3570k system running win10, although it's been relegated to troubleshooting and testing parts.
Might I suggest installing Linux or ChromeOS?
I am trying out Mint and it feels fine as a long time Win7/8/10/11 user.
Well, they could do that.There are OS plugins/services that Microsoft could ask the consumer to pay a monthly/yearly subscription for. An example could be a Supreme Windows version that would include additional plugins (such as an advanced AI) and services (such as ad free) . A standard version, with ads that can't be disabled, would be for free.
The Win11's kernel and the release time frame were both heavily influenced by Intel's first heterogeneous CPU and integration with Thread Director. If you think it's super easy to just update an OS for that new paradigm, consider that it took over two years of development to bring something similar to Linux which only just starting approaching Win11 efficiency with Thread Director in Feb of this year. As for Win10, it seems perfectly reasonable to me to not put that much effort in to new features on software that already has a well defined life cycle and end of life.What is there "completely different"?
And who said that Win10 kernel can't do that scheduling? It's just that they don't want to add it to Win10 to give an excuse for forced update to Win11. It's as ridiculous as requirement for TPM.
For number 6, see this https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/windows-11-free-or-cheapSo this is basically Microsoft blackmailing Windows 10 users.
1. Move to Windows 11 for free if hardware supported and give us all your telemetry data and we start showing you ads.
2. Buy new hardware from our OEM friends, pay the hidden Windows tax for a "free" licence and give us all your telemetry data and we start showing you ads.
3. Pay us to keep a perfectly good OS secure that you got free or via the Windows tax when equipment was new and is still perfectly good or when you purchased Windows licences and give us all your telemetry data and we start showing you ads.
4. Do nothing and hope you don't get infected by security holes we created in of poor quality coding.
5. Look to a Linux derivative and tell Microsoft to go stick Windows up Satya Nadella 💩
6. and my personal recommendation, download the Windows 11 ISO, disable all of Microsoft dirty activation tricks and enjoy your computer, while flipping the bird at Satya Nadella.
How about a guide on no.6 TH for those who need assistance, if you have the guts, it's not illegal !!!
And that tell us nothing about changes to kernel.The Win11's kernel and the release time frame were both heavily influenced by Intel's first heterogeneous CPU and integration with Thread Director.
yea right , this will open the way for MS to intentionally put security flaws in each update then ask you to pay for extended update ... and the circle continues on and on and on and on ...
I thought that a Product should be PERFECT and without any issue , if you have a security problem , People should ask YOU to pay them money not the other way !
we forgive MS because they fix THEIR MISTAKES for FREE ... now you ask us to pay for your mistakes MS ?
I may do it just because Windows 11 is still inferior to Win 10 performance wise.With this move from Microsoft for all those EOL computers that can't make the Windows 11 cutoff they can at least have a path forward with patches past the official EOL for windows 10.
$30 a year is a drop in the bucket if your not ready to do the full hardware shuffle to stay in the game with windows 11.
Take care! It might not be "30 us per year". It might only be for one year.I will pay 30 us per year if I can keep away from windows 11. My valve save us from the pain (windows 11)
support against their mistakes ? they should be lucky I dont sue them for selling me not perfect codes.What do you think the price of an OS would be if the company offering it had to support the OS for eternity and have to pay you every time a security update was needed?
If you've never (knowingly) had any security issues using Windows 7 online after 2019, what's to stop you using Windows 10 online after October 2025?Were going on 5 years that EOL happened for Windows 7 and have never had a security issue happen without having patching that ended in 2019.
support against their mistakes ? they should be lucky I dont sue them for selling me not perfect codes.
No not at all.Are you saying that Windows Updates are a waste of time?
Have you tried Process Lasso from Bitsum on Win 10? It works very well and is reasonably priced. You make is sound like it is insanely difficult to manage threads on Win 10. Yet here is a very nice program with a good price that fixes the "Thread management issue" on Win 10.The Win11's kernel and the release time frame were both heavily influenced by Intel's first heterogeneous CPU and integration with Thread Director. If you think it's super easy to just update an OS for that new paradigm, consider that it took over two years of development to bring something similar to Linux which only just starting approaching Win11 efficiency with Thread Director in Feb of this year. As for Win10, it seems perfectly reasonable to me to not put that much effort in to new features on software that already has a well defined life cycle and end of life.
So after a virus attack, you've restored your Windows 10 to its former unpatched glory, but in the mean time:Even worse case scenario lets say it's 2029 you get the worst virus the internet could throw at you. Clone your back up back onto your system and keep rolling.
Thank goodness I've not suffered a Ransomware Attack (yet?). It can take weeks after the infection before you discover files are being encrypted. How are you supposed to know which specific web site caused the problem and avoid it in future?Most of us know what we were doing at the time we all have been taken down from something on the web.
Sure it's possible... if you have admin rights, understand the processes to know where to stick them, and your workloads aren't dynamic which would require reshuffling. For 99.99% of everyone else, Thread Director on Win11 is the answer.Have you tried Process Lasso from Bitsum on Win 10? It works very well and is reasonably priced. You make is sound like it is insanely difficult to manage threads on Win 10. Yet here is a very nice program with a good price that fixes the "Thread management issue" on Win 10.
If you run past the EOL going forward yes all those issues could happen same as a patched windows 11 could get attacked as well.The simple breakdown is were facing three choices.
Throw in the towel if you have a system that can't run windows 11 to keep Microsoft updates running.
= New PC with new OS Windows 11 with updates.
If you want Window 10 updates past 2025 EOL swipe the credit card.
I suppose at a high level it all looks the same, but scheduling different cores isn't as easy as a toggle switch to turn it on or off. ARM and x86 are completely different. AMD normal/x3d are scheduled completely differently from Intel P/E cores. Frankly, AMD core parking driver is a pretty clumsy way to push threads around, but that's not far off from how Intel P/E cores are scheduled in Win10. Win11 recieves feedback at the instruction level of threads in flight and makes realtime decisions. For example a thread from an in focus window is always sent to P on Win10 even when the thread issues mwait and is sitting idle. Win11 can push that thread to E and free up P and/or package power. Can you do that on Win10 with process lasso as someone else pointed out? yeah kinda. Can you do that with millisecond precision? no.And that tell us nothing about changes to kernel.
"Intel's first heterogeneous CPU" is first only for Intel. ARM had it for a long time and through Windows-on-ARM efforts kernel should've supported it also long before Intel chips.