Jeff Fx :
>You set the dial on the touchscreen display and then rotate the dial clockwise or counterclockwise to alter the images on the screen.
So you cover part of the screen with a dial instead of using a control object displayed on the screen, or using a dial that does not cover the screen? Is that insane? It seems insane to me.
What you are missing is simple. you never use the whole screen, if you need something behind it, you move it, a physical object is always more intuitive to use then a digital one. What this really comes down to is how useful the thing is over all and what you can have attached to it.
Not to mention, a wacom monitors start at around 2000$ shipped, a comparable computer is around 700-1500
and this screen isn't even the 99.7% adobergb ones, they are the 92-97% i forget where it bottoms out.
the more expensive screens are around 2900$ shipped, just shy of one of these, and is about 1/4th the screen real estate.
this kicks the crap out of wacom's offerings buy a significant margin.
cant wait to see how wacom responds.
The only concerning thing about the surface studio is if it can be used as a monitor, because wacom, you can typically buy it once and use it till its broken, but a pc, especially in a professional realm, is a bit more disposable.
would love to see a stand alone monitor with a sleek companion computer, maybe something that can easily be back mounted.