Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (
More info?)
In news:OXZoKmzXFHA.2540@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl,
Doug Knox MS-MVP <dknox@mvps.org> typed:
> I'd have to disagree with that, Ken, on some level. I have
> found
> programs that were built with the VB6 runtimes referenced, but
> they
> ran fine on a Win2K machine that only had the VB5 runtimes.
> That
> tells me that many of the "functions" that exist in later
> versions,
> exist in ealier versions, as well.
Thanks, Doug. Interesting! I've never run across that, and as far
as I know, they are not supposed to be compatible.
Perhaps despite what's supposed to happen, there is sometimes
compatibility using certain programs, but not others.
--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup
> "Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:OShZIhyXFHA.2288@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> In news:eR1UrUyXFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl,
>> Doug Knox MS-MVP <dknox@mvps.org> typed:
>>
>>> Best to get it directly from the source:
>>>
>>>
http://download.microsoft.com/download/vb40ent/sample27/1/w9xnt4/en-us/vb4run.exe
>>>
>>> And no, VBRun300 won't do. The application is specifically
>>> looking
>>> for features that were introduced in VB4. The VB5 and/or
>>> VB6
>>> runtimes might be backward compatible, as well.
>>
>>
>> Doug, they're all separate. There is neither forward nor
>> backward
>> compatibility in any of the VBRUNnnn files.
>>
>> --
>> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
>> Please reply to the newsgroup
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Brian21" <Brian21@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>>> message
>>> news:7E3DEE34-BB92-4D6A-90A4-B0EDCC108AC2@microsoft.com...
>>>> Everytime I run a program on my hard drive i always get an
>>>> error
>>>> message about a missing VBRUN400.DLL file. How can i get a
>>>> copy of
>>>> the missing VBRUN400.DLL file? Also, i have a VBRUN300.DLL
>>>> file on
>>>> my computer. can I use it instead?