Monitor doesn't get signal from vid card,

[Tom]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

"francis gérard" <spam@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:e64kcW6iEHA.140@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

> i think
> Nathan is SMART enough to figure that out on his own, and doesn't need
> persnickety pricks like you to hit-n-run on a discussion thread without
> contributing anything of value.

LOL! Nathan is smart enough (I know that myself), but you sure didn't post like that. Here are your post in order:

1: "Nathan McNulty" <nospam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%23W9TpK1iEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > How about the onboard video? See my other post

> the Intel D850GB does not have onboard video

> --
> francis

2: "Nathan McNulty" <nospam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:etGnoJ1iEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > I am surprised nobody has metioned this yet. You have an i850G chipset.
> > This means you have an integrated video controller. By changing the battery
> > out, you have reset the BIOS settings which default back to the integrated
> > video card. Try connecting the monitor to the other video source

> the Intel D850GB does not have onboard video

> --
> francis


3: > "francis gérard" <spam@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:%23RXYSb4iEHA.3664@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> > "Nathan McNulty" <nospam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:etGnoJ1iEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>I am surprised nobody has metioned this yet. You have an i850G chipset.
>>> This means you have an integrated video controller. By changing the
>>> battery out, you have reset the BIOS settings which default back to the
>>> integrated video card. Try connecting the monitor to the other video
>>> source
>>
>> the Intel D850GB does not have onboard video

> and of course, you're right, that was also the first thing i thought of, but
> being unfamiliar with the D850GB, i looked it up on the ****Intel site to see if
> it had integrated video, which it does not**** (**** added to show the same thing you > stated twice before)

> http://support.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/d850gb/

> --
> francis




>
>> you don't like what i have to say... BLOCK ME and FO!
>
>> Wow, getting pissy regarding what you *think* I like or don't like
>> (though I never posted a word to convey that thought)!
>> Do yourself a favor, don't assume so much, and direct your reply according
>> to the query.
>
> i'll stop assuming when you stop your bitching about my articles

Who said I was bitching, I simply asked question, then you bitched!

>
>> Anyway, what is your answer to the question?
>
> you idiot... haven't you been following this thread??? i think not. READ
> CAREFULLY, i've contributed many follow-up articles to the original query.

Your first two were not follow ups, as I posted above, rather exact simplistic replies, the third showed you felt the need to explain what you probably felt what he needed as an explanation. Anyway, you accuse me of not following the thread, when I ask you why you made the same simple point to Nathan three times. Ever wonder why you feel the need to be sure someone follows your thread?

I'll check back to see if you, somehow, interpret this latest reply to you as a form of "bitching" LOL!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Before this post turns into WWIII

I am used to Intel Chipsets such as i865G being their integrated
graphincs. I simply assumed it was 850G for the chipset. This was MY
fault for not looking this up first before posting.

As for francis, he did exactly what I would have done. The two posts
were seperated and I would have followed up both of them just as he did.
As for this from francis' thread: "furthermore, i would not
say any such thing about Nathan, as i've read many of his articles, he,
unlike yourself, is one of the few who do NOT say dumb things.". I have
had my moments of stupidity. We are all allowed those moments

To Tom, thanks for defending me. It is always great to know that others
respect my opinions as well as those of others (especially the MVP's who
try their hardest to provide consistent help). I really enjoy the level
of intelligence and willingness to help that is so easily seen
throughout these newsgroups.

Sorry I didn't repsond earlier to this post, but I was at work all day
and just got home

----
Nathan McNulty

Tom wrote:
> "francis gérard" <spam@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:e64kcW6iEHA.140@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>
>> i think
>>Nathan is SMART enough to figure that out on his own, and doesn't need
>>persnickety pricks like you to hit-n-run on a discussion thread without
>>contributing anything of value.
>
>
> LOL! Nathan is smart enough (I know that myself), but you sure didn't post like that. Here are your post in order:
>
> 1: "Nathan McNulty" <nospam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:%23W9TpK1iEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
>>>How about the onboard video? See my other post
>
>
>>the Intel D850GB does not have onboard video
>
>
>>--
>>francis
>
>
> 2: "Nathan McNulty" <nospam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:etGnoJ1iEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
>>>I am surprised nobody has metioned this yet. You have an i850G chipset.
>>>This means you have an integrated video controller. By changing the battery
>>>out, you have reset the BIOS settings which default back to the integrated
>>>video card. Try connecting the monitor to the other video source
>
>
>>the Intel D850GB does not have onboard video
>
>
>>--
>>francis
>
>
>
> 3: > "francis gérard" <spam@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:%23RXYSb4iEHA.3664@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>>>"Nathan McNulty" <nospam@msn.com> wrote in message
>>>news:etGnoJ1iEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>>I am surprised nobody has metioned this yet. You have an i850G chipset.
>>>>This means you have an integrated video controller. By changing the
>>>>battery out, you have reset the BIOS settings which default back to the
>>>>integrated video card. Try connecting the monitor to the other video
>>>>source
>>>
>>>the Intel D850GB does not have onboard video
>
>
>>and of course, you're right, that was also the first thing i thought of, but
>>being unfamiliar with the D850GB, i looked it up on the ****Intel site to see if
>>it had integrated video, which it does not**** (**** added to show the same thing you > stated twice before)
>
>
>>http://support.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/d850gb/
>
>
>>--
>>francis
>
>
>
>
>
>>>you don't like what i have to say... BLOCK ME and FO!
>>
>>>Wow, getting pissy regarding what you *think* I like or don't like
>>>(though I never posted a word to convey that thought)!
>>>Do yourself a favor, don't assume so much, and direct your reply according
>>>to the query.
>>
>>i'll stop assuming when you stop your bitching about my articles
>
>
> Who said I was bitching, I simply asked question, then you bitched!
>
>
>>>Anyway, what is your answer to the question?
>>
>>you idiot... haven't you been following this thread??? i think not. READ
>>CAREFULLY, i've contributed many follow-up articles to the original query.
>
>
> Your first two were not follow ups, as I posted above, rather exact simplistic replies, the third showed you felt the need to explain what you probably felt what he needed as an explanation. Anyway, you accuse me of not following the thread, when I ask you why you made the same simple point to Nathan three times. Ever wonder why you feel the need to be sure someone follows your thread?
>
> I'll check back to see if you, somehow, interpret this latest reply to you as a form of "bitching" LOL!
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

"Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:uvIXRy8iEHA.1712@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...


> LOL! Nathan is smart enough (I know that myself), but you sure > didn't
> post like that. Here are your post in order:

[...]

> Your first two were not follow ups, as I posted above, rather exact
> simplistic replies,
> the third showed you felt the need to explain what you probably felt what
> he needed as
> an explanation. Anyway, you accuse me of not following the thread, when I
> ask you why
> you made the same simple point to Nathan three times. Ever wonder why you
> feel the need
> to be sure someone follows your thread?

> I'll check back to see if you, somehow, interpret this latest reply to you
> as a form of "bitching" LOL!

you're not following the entire discussion... go to the source of the
thread, at the top, starting with the original query from 'TheBladeRoden',
expand all the threads... you will see that there are lots of helpful
followups from me. i count 7 articles from myself, not including the
followups to nathan and this bullsh*t with you! that makes at least 10
followups from me in this discussion thread.

look, it's your problem that you can't follow a newsgroup discussion... and
this bitching and banter is useless. you've added your 2cents worth
(literally), now piss-off if you can't say or add anything useful. i'm
tired of your idiocy.

--
francis

 

[Tom]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

"francis gérard" <spam@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:O4ZLFq9iEHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

You have to be one of the most fragile people I've encountered in these groups!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

"Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:%23ypnCz9iEHA.3632@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

"francis gérard" <spam@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:O4ZLFq9iEHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

> You have to be one of the most fragile people I've encountered in these
> groups!

opinions are just that

ask me if i care... NO
--
francis