More GeforceFX benchmarks

[wschuerm]

http://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/2002/11-19_b.php



Remember the time You used 20Mb harddrives

 

[Spitfire_x86]

Clickable version <A HREF="http://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/2002/11-19_b.php " target="_new">http://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/2002/11-19_b.php </A>

Let us know <A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/community/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=25703#25703" target="_new"> What File compression format you use? </A>

 

[edurm]

that seams to me UNREAL that is too fast to be true, 2.3 times faster than ti4600 and still using beta drives ... that seams too me faster than thought speedy

 

[AndrewT]

I'll believe whatever tom and his gang going to show after benchmarking the first working FX card. till then it's all speculation and I'm not going to be part if it.

it's still months away so who gives a flying [-beep-] about hopes and dreams people have!? honestly

ps I didn't read it, don't care

<b><font color=blue>Press 1 if you want to be on hold, 2 for disconnect, 3 for a representative who will put you on hold before disconnecting.</font color=blue></b>

 

[Ghostdog]

Months away? No, nVidia and PNY are going to showcase a GeForceFX at some winter gaming-event. I´ll dig up the link when I have some more time.

<font color=red>I´m starting to feel like a real computer consultant.</font color=red>

 

[AndrewT]

yeah but I mean when it's going to be ready and shipped to stores so regular people can buy it.

<b><font color=blue>Press 1 if you want to be on hold, 2 for disconnect, 3 for a representative who will put you on hold before disconnecting.</font color=blue></b>

 

[Ghostdog]

OK, yeah. 2 months.

<font color=red>I´m starting to feel like a real computer consultant.</font color=red>

 

[Awaks]

*sighs* erm, anyone notice that the results published there were "source nvidia"? Tend to agree with Andrew, tired of all the speculation on a product not releasing any time soon...

 

[Gorgias]

Alot of these benchmarks are with anit-aliasing or AF-filtering; two areas where the 9700Pro really outperformed the GF4, so don´t be surprised that the GFFX does well compared to GF4. It SHOULD do that because the GeForce 4600 was really bad in those departments.

The interesting thing will be to see how it does compared to the 9700 Pro.

/Daniel

 

[edurm]

me too, I´ll belive when I see at THG

 

[phial]

the GF4 doesnt perform 'really bad', just not as good as the r300.

the GF4 kicks the GF3s ass in those departments because its a newer design, just as the r300 and NV30 are newer designs than the GF4

;p

 

[davepermen]

the GF4 kicks the GF3s ass in those departments because its a newer design, just as the r300 and NV30 are newer designs than the GF4

uhm..
gf1 was new design. gf2 was just more of it. gf3 was new design. gf4 was just more of it. nv30 is new design. too bad its yet now only fast because of bruteforce. we'll see how good gfFX2 will boost up the yet maximized performance..

and the gf4 is quite a bunch lower as the r300, _if_ they really compared both gfFX and gf4 with antialiasing.. try it without to be fair. then you'll see the gfFX is not _that_ much faster than the gf4. the gf4 is just very low on antialiasing (and aa + anysotropic just kills the poor gf4..😀)

technically seen, the r300 is much more advanced than the gf4. and the gfFX does actually not provide much more advanced technique (in quite a bunch of places the r300 is actually still more advanced, hehe😀)

anyways. can't wait to actually _SEE_ one of the gfFX in one of our shops. and look at the price-tag. hehe. i will for sure rofl. last time, gf4, they nearly tagged 1000sfr.. my radeon was 700sfr right from the start. i bet the gfFX will beat the 1000sfr😀
today, you can have a pc with p4 in for that price😀 a full pc. including screen! 😀

"take a look around" - limp bizkit

www.google.com

 

[phial]

you are right mostly about the GF4 being a new design. they took the GF3 and improved on it..

but in these improvments they added more vertex shaders, and a AA engine that uses a much more efficient technique than the GF3. thats why i was referring to the GF4 being able to kick the GF3s ass in AA and ansiotropic filtering