Not for gaming purposes, but as a workstation so they will all be 60 MHZ - 75 MHZ at most. Would like something with 3 DP's.
My statement was trying to say that paying MORE for a "workstation" graphics card is not going to improve your performance over a "gaming" grapics card. You can usually get more hardware for the same $$$ with a gaming graphics card compared to a workstation card.I mean, they are both workstation graphics cards and I will be using them on 60 Hz refresh monitors.... I wouldn't need a gaming card.
What apps will you be taxing the GPU/system with, what is your budget and where are you located(preferred site for purchase)? You might also want to state the make and models of the monitors since connectivity will also be a part to consider.
Anyone able to tell the spec difference between these two? Is NVIDIA just a better choice in general than AMD?So I'm going with a workstation card over gaming , as it fits my needs better. The 2 options are
1. Amd Radeon Pro WX 5100
https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/radeon-pro-wx5100-datasheet.pdf
2. NVIDIA Quadro P2200
https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/...adro-p2200-datasheet-letter-974207-r4-web.pdf
The Radeon has more memory... but considering I already have 64 GB RAM... is the Quaddro a better choice in terms of driving 3-4 4k monitors?
For your use-case, a workstation graphics card will have no benefits over a gaming card.So I'm going with a workstation card over gaming , as it fits my needs better. The 2 options are
1. Amd Radeon Pro WX 5100
https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/radeon-pro-wx5100-datasheet.pdf
2. NVIDIA Quadro P2200
https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/...adro-p2200-datasheet-letter-974207-r4-web.pdf
The Radeon has more memory... but considering I already have 64 GB RAM... is the Quaddro a better choice in terms of driving 3-4 4k monitors?
I mean, they are both workstation graphics cards and I will be using them on 60 Hz refresh monitors.... I wouldn't need a gaming card.For your use-case, a workstation graphics card will have no benefits over a gaming card.
My statement was trying to say that paying MORE for a "workstation" graphics card is not going to improve your performance over a "gaming" grapics card. You can usually get more hardware for the same $$$ with a gaming graphics card compared to a workstation card.I mean, they are both workstation graphics cards and I will be using them on 60 Hz refresh monitors.... I wouldn't need a gaming card.
Oh, I didn't know that. The gaming ones looked a lot more expensive and seemed optimized for higher refresh rates, so I prefer the bandwidth for the amount of multitasking and charts necessary.My statement was trying to say that paying MORE for a "workstation" graphics card is not going to improve your performance over a "gaming" grapics card. You can usually get more hardware for the same $$$ with a gaming graphics card compared to a workstation card.