In selecting a motherboard for an i5-8600, I at first dismissed Z370 on the notion that its pointless for anything without a K on the end of it and was shopping H370 and B360 models based on features alone. A piece over at TechSpot was brought to my attention which got me wondering though: in it they found that a particularly low end B360 board could not deliver enough power for an 8700 to maintain its all-core max turbo clock. While that would be considered by most an extreme "mis-pairing", it got me wondering where the intersection lies in terms of a Coffee Lake being "too much" for a given motherboard. By all accounts an 8400 should be aptly accommodated by just about anything, but what about an 8500...or 8600...?
Of course some will suggest playing it safe and "overbuy" a Z370 and I could just go with an MSI Z370M Mortar (only thing it doesn't have is USB3.1 G2). I'd rather take a more objective, pragmatic approach but information on a motherboard's power-to-the-CPU capability is obfuscated at best, non-existent at worst.
Non-Z boards I'm considering (all basically the same price):
MSI H370M Bazooka
MSI B360M Mortar
Asus Prime H370M Plus
Asus TUF B360M Plus Gamer
Manufacturers seem to be using B360 in "better" series compared to H370 which confuses me as the H370 is supposed to be the more upscale of the two.
Looking at Asus, is the TUF really any better built than the Prime, or is it really just a bunch of bling? The "Asus TUF Protection" reads almost verbatim the same as "Asus 5X Protection III", except the former quotes 5 Phase power, the latter 6 Phase... which on the face of it you'd think is better in the context of my main concern: driving an i5-8600.
Looking at MSI a similar situation: B360 available as "Mortar" with what looks like additional VRMs and 2nd heat sink compared to H370 Bazooka.
Its enough to give a person purchase paralysis.
Of course some will suggest playing it safe and "overbuy" a Z370 and I could just go with an MSI Z370M Mortar (only thing it doesn't have is USB3.1 G2). I'd rather take a more objective, pragmatic approach but information on a motherboard's power-to-the-CPU capability is obfuscated at best, non-existent at worst.
Non-Z boards I'm considering (all basically the same price):
MSI H370M Bazooka
MSI B360M Mortar
Asus Prime H370M Plus
Asus TUF B360M Plus Gamer
Manufacturers seem to be using B360 in "better" series compared to H370 which confuses me as the H370 is supposed to be the more upscale of the two.
Looking at Asus, is the TUF really any better built than the Prime, or is it really just a bunch of bling? The "Asus TUF Protection" reads almost verbatim the same as "Asus 5X Protection III", except the former quotes 5 Phase power, the latter 6 Phase... which on the face of it you'd think is better in the context of my main concern: driving an i5-8600.
Looking at MSI a similar situation: B360 available as "Mortar" with what looks like additional VRMs and 2nd heat sink compared to H370 Bazooka.
Its enough to give a person purchase paralysis.