Interesting to see just how well the AMD rig keeps up..and why you would choose it over an Intel solution if you wanted a decent system at a very low price point. I've recently seen certain British computer magazines saying the AMD A64 x2 isn't good enough, which is ludicrous. The A64 x2 does have to run faster to keep up with Core 2, but the difference isn't monumental and looking when you look at the chipset features you see that AMD wins hands down.
I wish tech journalists would be more informed..perhaps they should open their eyes, do their research and actually test systems properly. It's almost like they can't read simple bar graphs like the one's you see here because some of the comments they come out with are ridiculous and yet their articles influence millions of people who can seldom afford to recoup their losses when they make a bad purchase, ie they want to buy a dirt-cheap computer to play older games and watch blue-ray..they buy an Intel solution with a G45 chipset, and wonder why their films stutter and their games are slideshows.