MSI reveals new information on AMD's AM5 platform in the latest installment of the MSI Insider show.
MSI Showcases AM5 Socket, X670 Platform's Dual Chipsets : Read more
MSI Showcases AM5 Socket, X670 Platform's Dual Chipsets : Read more
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
Only time will tell whether it's a sound decision to relocate the capacitors, as many users are worried that the excess thermal compound could fall on the capacitors.
You are basing all of your claims on nothing that is unbiased. When Ryzen launched it was a mess in several of the ways you mentioned, however, that has no barring on Zen 4. I will be right there with you if it releases with issues. "only" 16 cores, lmao. If you need more than 16 there are several options more relevant to you up to 64 if you had any need for more threads.f AMD and their garbage 1st gen new platform chipsets / mobo
if I were to guess it will have issues with DDR5 memory for months, they will stop productions after release day & they will stop bios support after just 2 cpu gens
no amount of premium flare & worthless pcie5 will get me to buy into 1st gen AM5 mobo with Zen4 being 16core only and crap performance increase
Unlikely and even Zen 1s problems were wildly overstated by toxic people and haters. Actual people with knowledge (not tech noobs) didn’t have big problems with it, some annoyance maybe. And the problems were all solved with bios updates later, so it was only the very beginning of Ryzen 1000 and that’s it.f AMD and their garbage 1st gen new platform chipsets / mobo
if I were to guess it will have issues with DDR5 memory for months, they will stop productions after release day & they will stop bios support after just 2 cpu gens
no amount of premium flare & worthless pcie5 will get me to buy into 1st gen AM5 mobo with Zen4 being 16core only and crap performance increase
My first experience dealing with AM4 is having a no-boot, then getting accused by the store of frying components, the store spending an hour parts-swapping components until they found a combination that worked on the board before they could do a BIOS update and ultimately find out that all components were perfectly fine.Unlikely and even Zen 1s problems were wildly overstated by toxic people and haters.
My first Zen Experience was with my 3900x on release day with the ASUS x570-f board. There were several overclocking settings bugs, multiple bugs related to Ryzen Master program causing issues, chipset drivers not installing / updating properly, et cetera. People that downplay the problems related to the 1000s CPU release are living in a bubble. I remember so many posts here about so many problems. In my case everything was fixed within the first few weeks of release and none of the issues prevented safe use of the CPU for what I needed it for.My first experience dealing with AM4 is having a no-boot, then getting accused by the store of frying components, the store spending an hour parts-swapping components until they found a combination that worked on the board before they could do a BIOS update and ultimately find out that all components were perfectly fine.
The only way it could have gone worse would have been if the store hadn't struggled to get anything working, then it would likely have stuck with the initial accusation.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Reddit, Toms, and other forums were blowing up when Ryzen 1000 released with all kinds of issues for months. It is widely known that Ryzen 1k had a bumpy launch with many many BIOS, RAM, and connectivity issues that were widespread.Sorry but anecdotal stories are hardly evidence, and most people as a matter of fact, had low to no problems with it. Otherwise Ryzen 1000 would’ve been a huge failure, but it wasn’t.
Here my own anecdotal story: 3700X didn’t boot with both 3600 RAMs in (2x16 GB) on my X570 board, did a quick bios update and it worked then flawlessly. That’s it. I bet most people had the same story as me or even easier, depending on which Ram they used, the more you want the more you’re running into compatibility problems. With Ryzen 1000 it was simple to get it running with lower clocked Ram, guess what, that’s what most people did. It was more complicated once you wanted more clocks and possibly more than advertised by AMD.
Just confirms what I already said.You have no idea what you are talking about. Reddit, Toms, and other forums were blowing up when Ryzen 1000 released with all kinds of issues for months. It is widely known that Ryzen 1k had a bumpy launch with many many BIOS, RAM, and connectivity issues that were widespread.
The way the shop had to go through over a dozen of hardware permutations between CPUs, motherboards and RAM when my friend brought his Ryzen 1700X back because I couldn't get a boot strongly suggests to me that this was far from being an isolated incident.Give me some hard evidence, factual proof of how many users had problems vs users that had not. Yea, no, you’re not winning this argument. Ryzen 1000s problems were greatly overstated.
It wasn’t a great launch, I didn’t argue this. The only thing I argued was nerds exaggerating things, and this is a normal occurrence for decades in tech forums. The problems were fixed after a few weeks, and if you had ordered the right RAM with your mainboard, there wasn’t any problem to begin with. There are compatibility lists that get regularly ignored by everyone because they think “they don’t matter”. Or amateurs thinking they can build a PC while they simply have no clue, not even that a list exists.The way the shop had to go through over a dozen of hardware permutations between CPUs, motherboards and RAM when my friend brought his Ryzen 1700X back because I couldn't get a boot strongly suggests to me that this was far from being an isolated incident.
While we may not have numbers of the proportion of successful first-time boots vs failed, all indicators point toward Ryzen 1000's launch being far worse than typical.
Show-stopping launch issues are practically unheard of with Intel chips. I've never had an Intel build I couldn't get to boot with almost any random bunch of known-good parts and I've never heard of anyone running into such issues either. The Ryzen 1000 launch was quite unique in how bad the out-of-box memory compatibility was. While AMD did release a bunch of AGESA updates over the first couple of months that fixed the bulk of these issues, that does nothing for all the boards already shipped with launch-day versions still in the distribution channels. This ensured that people would continue running into launch-day issues with their new builds on a regular basis through most of the first year.The alder lake launch wasn’t great either
Your argument is anecdotal. Where is the evidence of the, "nerds exaggerating things," on such forums and that it is a, "normal occurrence for decades," that they have been doing so? At least I have the luxury of clarity of mind to remember the literal thousands of posts on multiple tech forums regarding a multitude of issues with the Ryzen 1000 launch.The only thing I argued was nerds exaggerating things, and this is a normal occurrence for decades in tech forums.
Sure my argument is anecdotal for you, if you pick a part of it out, without understanding the full picture I painted.Your argument is anecdotal. Where is the evidence of the, "nerds exaggerating things," on such forums and that it is a, "normal occurrence for decades," that they have been doing so? At least I have the luxury of clarity of mind to remember the literal thousands of posts on multiple tech forums regarding a multitude of issues with the Ryzen 1000 launch.
I’m gonna stick with this, your arguments aren’t convincing to me, not even remotely.The problems were fixed after a few weeks, and if you had ordered the right RAM with your mainboard, there wasn’t any problem to begin with. There are compatibility lists that get regularly ignored by everyone because they think “they don’t matter”. Or amateurs thinking they can build a PC while they simply have no clue, not even that a list exists.
Games failing to launch with Alder Lake wasn't Intel's fault, it was mostly the games DRM or anti-cheat getting triggered by the uneven performance between P/E cores, nothing wrong with the hardware itself.Alder Lake launch surely wasn’t great, with CPU issues, games flat out not working. People have selective memories, typical AMD vs Intel debate, despite the mind share AMD picked up, Intel is still seen as “better”, interesting, but not true
I'm guessing me, yourself, and others just weren't included in, "The most experienced users," that, "had no problem," with Ryzen 1000. See, if we knew what we were doing and we had more experience on a wholly new platform that didn't exist prior, we would have not had any issues.Games failing to launch with Alder Lake wasn't Intel's fault, it was mostly the games DRM or anti-cheat getting triggered by the uneven performance between P/E cores, nothing wrong with the hardware itself.