Mushkin Redline Frostbyte 16GB DDR4-2800 Review

[Crashman]

Mushkin’s “Redline Frostbyte” brings enhanced performance at mid-market prices. But can this DDR4 model outperform its value-minded competition designed for enthusiasts?

Mushkin Redline Frostbyte 16GB DDR4-2800 Review : Read more

 

[mapesdhs]

I liked the Mushkin kits I've bought in the past (not quite as good as
GSkill, but pretty decent), but the big down side of Mushkin, at least in
the UK, is availability. Aria seems to be one of the few sellers that stock
their products, in my case making it very difficult at one point to upgrade
a system with another kit since nowhere had them available. By contrast,
GSkill is much easier to find. Overall, I'd recommend GSkill over Mushkin
for this reason alone, but GSkill does tend to be cheaper anyway here.

Ian.

 

[Crashman]

See Ian, you're the perfect example of why I couldn't pick just one recommendation at or near this price/capacity

 

[ingtar33]

I've owned a serious of excellent gskill kits, and excellent mushkin redline kits.

I don't think anyone would go wrong with either.

 

[Kewlx25]

Mushkin, G.Skill, and Corsair are my fav brands. I don't think anything they make is bad, even outside of memory.

 

[JackNaylorPE]

"Since both kits support identical optimized values, I’d say that either Corsair was being cautious or Mushkin reckless. I’d love to hear your opinion in the response thread."

How about what's inside ? I see GPU reviews, PSU reviews, MoBo reviews where the unit is torn down and each part identified ..... how come reviewers don't look at whose modules are used ? I think that might just answer your question above.

One thing I noticed with DDR3-2400 was that Corsair VPs, Corsair Dominators and Muskin RL's both marketed sets for some time with 10-12-12-28 timings .... I had opened up both the VPs and RLs and both used Hynix modules. Then after a while, the VPs dropped to 10-12-12-31 and in searching for the reason behind the drop, I found out that (after version 4.51 IIRC), Corsair switched module suppliers. Mushkin still continues to offer 10-12-12-28 and I can personally confirm that they are still Hynix modules. Soon after the Dominators, also dropped to 10-12-12-31 leading me to believe they also switched suppliers.

My assumption at the time was that they each used Hynix in early years while production lines were young to maintain desired yields, but as lines matured and yields started to exceed demand, it made sense to switch to less expensive modules.

So.,.. to answer ya question, one of the possible reasons for the different performance observed could be eliminated if ya popped off the heat sinks and identified whose modules are underneath.

When I see DICE / LN2 users looking for those record breaking OCs, one of the things usually found in the siggies is RAM w/ Hynix modules at crazy voltages ... highest i can remember for DDR3 was 1.94

 

[cynic77]

Interesting comparisons in the article. I've been holding out for a 64 GB kit of DDR4-2800 Corsair Dominators... now I'm not so sure that would be a wise play.

Since DDR4 is relatively new and I've got an ASUS board, I've been looking at the supported memory spreadsheet (in PDF) that ASUS publishes on a regular basis. Unfortunately, my conclusion is that it's almost useless. There are Corsair models in it that don't even exist! (There are no Mushkin models listed, btw.) I suppose they can't claim you fried your motherboard because of using unsupported RAM if their list of supported modules isn't relevant, right?

 

[Crashman]

Interesting comparisons in the article. I've been holding out for a 64 GB kit of DDR4-2800 Corsair Dominators... now I'm not so sure that would be a wise play.

Since DDR4 is relatively new and I've got an ASUS board, I've been looking at the supported memory spreadsheet (in PDF) that ASUS publishes on a regular basis. Unfortunately, my conclusion is that it's almost useless. There are Corsair models in it that don't even exist! (There are no Mushkin models listed, btw.) I suppose they can't claim you fried your motherboard because of using unsupported RAM if their list of supported modules isn't relevant, right?

I wouldn't go beyond DDR4-2666 with eight modules right now, due to poor support of higher speeds by the memory controller. DDR4-2800 at 100 MHz BCLK is only stable under ideal conditions, and anything else higher than 2666 has you looking at a 125 MHz BCLK, by default.

I'd actually prefer DDR4-2400 for eight modules, because it doesn't get stuck with weird XMP settings. There's still lots of room to optimize timings for exceptional performance at that data rate.

 

[Jake W]

It's interesting that Tom's is recommending the 2800 rating Redline as the "ultimate value" choice when the 16GB DDR4-3000 rated Redline is only $4 more on New Egg. (It's actually cheaper than the Amazon price for the 2800.)

That being said, I'm glad to see this as I just purchased the aforementioned 16GB DDR4-3000 Redline Frostbyte for my new X99 build! =)

 

[Crashman]

It's interesting that Tom's is recommending the 2800 rating Redline as the "ultimate value" choice when the 16GB DDR4-3000 rated Redline is only $4 more on New Egg. (It's actually cheaper than the Amazon price for the 2800.)

That being said, I'm glad to see this as I just purchased the aforementioned 16GB DDR4-3000 Redline Frostbyte for my new X99 build! =)

It's about results, regardless of rating. Mushkin's DDR4-3000 might be superior, but if they didn't send any how would a tester know?

There are two awards at the end of the article, the other is for the baseline G.Skill DDR4-3000 to which is was compared. The kits are virtually identical. Both have the best value in overclocking of any kits tested.

A completely different product could have easily gotten this award if it had been submitted, it's just that simple (submit top kit at ordinary price, get award).

 

[JackNaylorPE]

It's about results, regardless of rating. Mushkin's DDR4-3000 might be superior, but if they didn't send any how would a tester know?

There are two awards at the end of the article, the other is for the baseline G.Skill DDR4-3000 to which is was compared. The kits are virtually identical. Both have the best value in overclocking of any kits tested.

A completely different product could have easily gotten this award if it had been submitted, it's just that simple (submit top kit at ordinary price, get award).

What are the chances of these types of articles identifying the module supplier in the future ?

 

[JackNaylorPE]

weird.... 2nd time 1 click got me a double post this month

 

[Crashman]

It's about results, regardless of rating. Mushkin's DDR4-3000 might be superior, but if they didn't send any how would a tester know?

There are two awards at the end of the article, the other is for the baseline G.Skill DDR4-3000 to which is was compared. The kits are virtually identical. Both have the best value in overclocking of any kits tested.

A completely different product could have easily gotten this award if it had been submitted, it's just that simple (submit top kit at ordinary price, get award).

What are the chances of these types of articles identifying the module supplier in the future ?

I quit peeling heat spreaders a long time ago when the chips started pulling off

 

[mapesdhs]

I wouldn't go beyond DDR4-2666 with eight modules right now, due to poor support of higher speeds by the memory controller. ...

Really? That's kinda yet another plus for going with used X79 for max-RAM configs then, since DDR3/2400 CL10
at 64GB is easy on a whole range of boards (I have a P9X79 WS and R4E), much cheaper too. Bugs me that
they chuck out a new tech for a new socket, advertise high speeds, sell it at 2X the cost of the old RAM, and
then we find the products can't even operate with the advertised settings.

Ian.

 

[Crashman]

I wouldn't go beyond DDR4-2666 with eight modules right now, due to poor support of higher speeds by the memory controller. ...

Really? That's kinda yet another plus for going with used X79 for max-RAM configs then, since DDR3/2400 CL10
at 64GB is easy on a whole range of boards (I have a P9X79 WS and R4E), much cheaper too. Bugs me that
they chuck out a new tech for a new socket, advertise high speeds, sell it at 2X the cost of the old RAM, and
then we find the products can't even operate with the advertised settings.

Ian.

I seem to remember similar discussions on the DDR3 transition...but anyway, the highest validated memory multiplier is 9 (9x 4:3 IMC:Core x 100 MHz x DDR = 2400) The highest standard multiplier is 10 (DDR4-2666), but motherboard manufacturers just aren't using it with XMP-2666, preferring to use 8 with the 1.25x BCLK strap (8x 4:3 IMC:Core x 125 MHz x DDR = 2666). I can only guess that they'd rather OC the BCLK using a validated multiplier.

Like I said, 2800 is 14x, it's a less-stable setting that works well when everything is perfect, but only on a few boards. 3000 is more stable because it uses the DDR4-2400 setting plus a stable 125 MHz BCLK, but then the board has to reconfigure multipliers and screw up turbo modes/power saving/ect.

Surprisingly, 2933 (11x) doesn't work well on the Asus board, even though 14x sometimes does. I believe Asus put extra time into stabilizing its 14x setting.

 

[mapesdhs]

I seem to remember similar discussions on the DDR3 transition...

Correct, early X79 mbd products couldn't handle 64GB and/or advertised higher speeds either,
which was just as annoying back then.

S'funny how in no other area of consumer tech & products is this sort of misleading advertising
tolerated.

Ian.

 

[JackNaylorPE]

I quit peeling heat spreaders a long time ago when the chips started pulling off

Not necessary on the Mushkin Ridgebacks, just take out the screws. I haven't tried the new Mushkin design yet but the old low profiles weren't bad at all using the hair dryer method.

But in the course of the review, I would assume you communicate with the suppliers and asking the question, even if not physically confirmed, would help. Of course, the fact that most of those who use Hynix in the beginning of a product's lifetime, will switch sometime down the line as lower cost manufacturer's yields improve affects the reliability of the information.

 

[Crashman]

Right, but the thing is, I didn't want to give any brand "preferential treatment". So when two brands began using glue and super-strong adhesive, I declared it a coup

 

[JackNaylorPE]

I can understand that .... I am bit less forgiving

I'd be like:

"Brand A told me they were Banana Republic modules and I confirmed this by easily .....

Brand B Wouldn't tell me squat and I can't determine cause they must use the same glue that holds the space shuttle's heat tiles on."

Tho given the elevated interest in modding, I wonder when they will start to think I am losing X % of sales to peeps who wanna water cool RAM just for "schitz and giggles" and Y % to modders who are color matching.

Even it's it's a small amount, these are the builds we see at shows and in "hot pc" articles.

Maybe a youtube guy will take up the charge .... I see these videos where they test an iPhone by seeing how high they can drop it from....that's more expensive than doing a dozen RAM modules .... So far on DDR3 I been able to distinguish Hynix by the timings at 2400. Everyone I opened at 10-12-12-28 was Hynix.

 

[Sabishii Hito]

Thaiphoon Burner can (usually) show which ICs are used on DDR4 modules, if not directly then indirectly. For instance, an ADATA kit I have didn't show the manufacturer but did show place of production as Suzhou, China. A little Goole-ing revealed Samsung as the only DRAM manuf with a plant there.