"sigh", here we go again:
This is becoming an anti-AMD forum
Nobody is, you are creating this reality.
Increasing the FSB (and memory speeds) on AMD systems increases performance emensely
Oh um, really?
So, when we get from 266MT FSB to 400MT that gave us 20% like a P4 had from 533 to 800MT?What you said here is the biggest contradiction in history. Wanna prove me that please? The Athlons were never needing high FSBs. Contrary to what you are thinking, an 800MT FSB would NOT be NEEDED. Athlons are not bandwidth hungry for christ's sake. Gee Willy, sudden PMS outburst on me huh?
And yes, any memory over 400MT is USELESS for K7s. Where did you start pulling crap man?
Oh, and 2.63ghz barton? Man you are an idiot, that would blow the 3.2c out of the water in UT2k3, and most other games. Just check out the barton 3200 benchmarks, I know that it loses, but its only at 2.2ghz. 2.63 (including the higher fsb) is WAY faster. I run my 2700 at 2.4, sometimes a bit higher when I benchmark, and in most games I compare my cpu to a 3.0C.
Too much overclocking LOWERS performance. Do you not remember the watercooled 3400+ THG tried to simulate? Do you remember how bad its performance dropped sometimes? (Or was that not a simulated Tbred 3700+, hmm) OCing too much CAN reduce performance due to latency penalties. So his results are believable. Let AMD get a 2.6GHZ out and whip the 3.2GHZ.
Eden, you keep talking about multimedia this multimedia that.
Dude, I am MENTIONNING it, mentionning it to counter the annoying "64-bit this, 64-bit that" that Kinney uses. It's a reality btw. Ever seen what Lightwave can do on a P4? The per-clock performance is over 20% better on the P4 side. You think that warrants no little gloating of the Multimedia aspect? :tongue:
Remember a couple days ago, someone posted a link to a video you could download off Microsofts site? It recommended (for the lower rez one) at least a 2.53ghz p4, OR an XP2200. I forget the recommendations for the higher res one, it was 3.0ghz P4, and I forget the recomended AMD equivalent, but it had approximately the same ratio as the recommendations for the lower res video.
Ya, see, most game box makers recommend the weirdest things. When was the last time you checked out EB Games or some PC games shop? Look at the recommended specs. They are screwed up badly. I guarantee you this will disprove the rather weak point you tried to make with that video on MS' site example.
For a specific program to take advantage of it, it must be programmed to do so.
I read on Discreet's site their 3dS Max 6 is HT optimized. I don't recall version 5 being optimized for HT, I could be wrong, and anyone who finds relevant data from their site and can show me, I'd appreciate it.
Could've sworn months ago when we had a hot debate on AMD vs Intel you bashed HT. Then again you often like to have a rough attitude on hardware lol.
Still man, your post looked like a freakin' PMS rise, I merely mentioned that 400MT DDR is more than enough for AXPs which is a proven fact and you jumped on me. BTW I CAN prove you it's pointless if you want to.
--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=blue><b>Are you ugly and looking into showing your mug? Then the THGC Album is the right place for you!</b></font color=blue></A>