Which is de facto given by having chosen a distro, otherwise you would be using all of them equally, you only use one because you think that that one is the best, automatically you are prejudice against any other distro.
SMH.......
(Note, see the given Tribalism definition at post 197)
Linux users are famous for distro hopping. So much that distro hopping is a well known phrase:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/distro-hopping
Distro hopping is not a tribal attitude, meaning that "being tribal" is not de facto a "given" just by having chosen a distro. Distro hoppers have some semblance of using them equally and will choose another later, exactly what you are requesting. "Tribalism" is actually an offshoot of monopoly, an offshoot of a lack of choice, and also
in particular it stems from cultures involving mass propaganda (especially over long periods of time) promoting superiority such as (
I apologize in advance for this dead-horse flogging moment I only mean to use an example) what Apple has developed among its base for years, decades even.
At the end of the day the Linuxes have very little difference between them with little room for marking contrasting differences - compared to the tribalism of Linux vs MS/MS vs Mac/Mac vs Linux. There can be about as much tribalism via Linux vs Linux as there is among people who live in the same gated community where all of the houses were built by the same contractor, are virtually the same minus a swimming pool, two extra sliding-glass windows along the back deck, a few have sunroofs, garage door faces sideways instead of forward, etc etc etc. Super minor differences. All the grass is still green, you're only allowed to choose from 4 house colors. Etc.
Maybe I should say it to you like this: There are three tribes. MS Mac and Linux. (I suppose BSD makes tribe 4?)
Distro-hopping is the kind of phenomena that can only happen in an open environment that fosters competition such as the
*BSD and
*Linux do.