So, is this storage Future Tech more like batteries (who always promise wonderful things in 2-5 years with almost no tangible consumer benefit), or is this more like CPU tech, where Moore's Law reigns?
Okay, now this is the kind of news Tomshardware should be posting about.
A few years from now, this could become the replacement for SSDs. Imagine, 2.24TB in a thumb drive sized storage unit. Incredible. Absolutely incredible.
5 years isnt soon enough ssd's price will go down by then and they'll be already in mass use. hopefully this works out because many times we never hear about these "breakthroughs" after further research.
So if you do the math a typical 2.5" drive can hold 8 of these chips so that 17.92TB. Depending on the thickness of the chip it can be layered 2 to 3 times providing capacities of 35.84TB and 53.76TB respectively. And for 3.5" drives the numbers more than double.
[citation][nom]Dekasav[/nom]I wonder if it could have possible use as CPU cache....[/citation]
Depends. It sounds like this has less to do with silicon, and more to do with lasers. There are technologies that are similar for processors that would utilize laser pulses, and therefore, could have some kind of co-relevance with this technology, but assuming current CPU technology, I think this is a radically different way of accessing data, and may require something closer to an optical drive (DVD) than a CPU.
[citation][nom]zoemayne[/nom]So if you do the math a typical 2.5" drive can hold 8 of these chips so that 17.92TB. Depending on the thickness of the chip it can be layered 2 to 3 times providing capacities of 35.84TB and 53.76TB respectively. And for 3.5" drives the numbers more than double.[/citation]
No, because this doesn't include the technology needed to read and write onto the chip.
It's kind of like saying, I can cram the entire contents of an encyclopeia onto the surface of a grain of rice. But that doesn't mean you could cram 1000's of them into a 3.5 inch drive because you need a gigantic electron microscope to read the information.
No, because this doesn't include the technology needed to read and write onto the chip.
It's kind of like saying, I can cram the entire contents of an encyclopeia onto the surface of a grain of rice. But that doesn't mean you could cram 1000's of them into a 3.5 inch drive because you need a gigantic electron microscope to read the information.
good point but im sure i was not the only one thinking about how many square inches a 2.5" drive can take.
I hope that this technology does get somewhere, and at earth prices.
It's funny when they said "this can be done "cost-effectively" but then
when it gets to the consumer the price is multiply by 1000+'s.
Also like many comments speculate, I too would like to know if multiple
of this chips could be used on a single unit and at earth prices.
hahaha -- if i had a dollar for every science project that was going to become a stupendous new tech product "within 5 years" i would be a zillionaire 😉