News Nature Retracts Controversial Room Temperature Superconductor Paper (But Not LK-99)

cyrusfox

Distinguished
Its nothing but crickets in here. HMMM I wonder why.
What are you seeking? A discussion of our continued decay from a high trust to a low trust society? Where verification is the only means one can trust?

Somebody ask Utah about cold fusion... Unfortunately a lot of these journals are just denser lies and on a rare occasion a platform to brag and show phenomenal work, but most of that amazing work is likely old trade secrets.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics, tale as old as time...
 

vanadiel007

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2015
368
361
19,060
Article is right on time. I predicted a few days ago we would see another article on super conductivity, and here we are!

In a few days we will see another article about China's AI analog chip claimed to be faster than Nvidia A100 GPU. Likely to explain it was not exactly like that...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyrusfox

elforeign

Distinguished
Oct 11, 2009
101
142
18,770
Thank you for the continued coverage on the LK-99 saga. It's a shame, wherever that shame may lie and to whomever may hold it, that the research behind the material was insufficient to drive forward the understanding of its behavior and under what conditions and formulations it could prove useful and replicable.
 

TJ Hooker

Titan
Ambassador
Thank you for the continued coverage on the LK-99 saga. It's a shame, wherever that shame may lie and to whomever may hold it, that the research behind the material was insufficient to drive forward the understanding of its behavior and under what conditions and formulations it could prove useful and replicable.
This article isn't about LK99, it's about an entirely different, supposed room temperature super conductor.