I just got a new router. It is the Linksys WRT1900ac. I replaced my old EA3500, which was 802.11n and seemed to suit me decently, considering I'm on wireless and my access point is two stories below (I live in a pretty big house). I would get five signal bars at most times, and if I am recalling correctly, I would get somewhere in-between -65 and -55 dBM. That seems pretty good to me. However, a few weeks back I upgraded my network card. I got an Asus PCE-AC68. The weird thing here, is that it seems to have lower coverage than my outdated PCE-N15 I had just replaced. It has three, huge Antennae, yet I rarely ever reached five signal bars, and often had a signal strength of higher than -69 dBM. For whatever reason, I had better ping and download performance than with the N15. I finally tossed my router, got the 1900ac, and the signal is much better. I still rarely get five bars on the taskbar, but five bars are shown elsewhere, which is ironic. The dBm jumps around a lot according to the control centre for my AC68. It goes as low as -41 dBm and as high as -64. I don't really find that trustworthy, considering it is Asus software, which are generally unpredictable from my experiences. The other application I am using for monitoring the signal strength is Xirrus Wifi Inspector. How good is this? It seems to display different results than the control centre, which are usually at least a few -dBm apart. At the moment, I am getting 84% signal strength, or -58 dBm according to Xirrus. How good are these numbers?