Next StarCraft 2 Chapter May Come In Early 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.

carlhenry

Distinguished
Aug 18, 2009
197
0
18,690
NooOOooo!!! I thought this'll be out anytime soon. Darn, after two years, SC 2 would look like crap T_T

promise to add support for dx11, make the hybrid race playable make sure the campaign is longer! Then, I'll understand.

Kerrigan!!! T_T

What about episode 3? 2014?!? Hello dx12.
 

jonnyboyC

Distinguished
May 11, 2009
769
0
19,060
All i'm going to say if development takes this long there better be an engine overhaul, the game looks pretty good now could have looked quite a bit better, but in 2014 or whenever the last expansion comes out it's going to be quite dated i mean i remember back in like 2008 or 2007 they were show demos of the engine
 

eklipz330

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2008
3,034
19
20,795
this is exactly what happens when a company has so much money and has to do little to continue profiting... little incentive to get off their asses and get shit done.
 

iamtheking123

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2010
410
0
18,780
They don't have to write an AI engine, they don't have to do any new graphics, and they don't have to do any beta testing. How could it possibly take longer than 3 days to throw some levels together and voice record some scenes.
 

barmaley

Distinguished
Aug 3, 2009
95
0
18,640
I'm not waiting on no starcraft expansion! To me personally, 90% of gameplay value of this game is in multiplayer. I beat the campaign once, I liked it, especially the jukebox soundtracks ("Zerg, shotgun" anyone???) But I don't see myself replaying it anytime soon. So, the only real benefit is the new units that may or may not be in it.

I agree with the first post that they finally need to get D3 out the door. One could be tempted to throw SC people on Diablo project instead. However, as we all know “adding more workers to a project running behind schedule will make it even later”. Blizzard never set a release date for D3, so it cannot be late by definition, but I feel this rule would still apply. So, D3 is just going to come out whenever it comes out…
 

gr33nf00t

Distinguished
Aug 16, 2009
49
0
18,530
Not sure what all the fuss is about. Blizzard always takes an eternity to get its games out the door. This is nothing new.
 

notsleep

Distinguished
Jan 19, 2010
219
0
18,680
yup by the time the 2nd one is released...the first one would look so outdated it's laughable. since these games are standalone, the disparity between part 1, part 2, and part 3 would look like night and day. you have dx9 for part 1, maybe dx10/dx11 for part 2, and maybe dx11.x/dx12 for part 3. then you have the next gen console released (xbox 720, ps4, nintendo wii 2) which would retard the pc gaming tech for another 5-6 years.
 

g00fysmiley

Distinguished
Apr 30, 2010
2,175
0
19,860
its blizzard.. it'll take till 2012 as stated it will likely be delayed... btu it will be worth it... they pump out a new halo every year and look where the quality there has gone ... give you a hint not in a good direction
 

bildo123

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2007
1,599
0
19,810
[citation][nom]dan117[/nom]2 years for levels and cutscenes...[/citation]

Basically, as far as the actual campaign goes...it seems to me like a bunch of people playing around in the galaxy editor. Of course there's more to it, in fact building the story would take up more time when compared to time spent in the galaxy editor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.