musical marv
Distinguished
- Feb 26, 2011
- 2,396
- 0
- 20,810
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Now theyve gone after FOX News James Rosen
In the affidavit, FBI agent Reginald Reyes said Rosen “asked, solicited and encouraged Mr. Kim to disclose sensitive United States internal documents and intelligence information.” He added, “The reporter did so by employing flattery and playing to Mr. Kim’s vanity and ego.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/justice-departments-scrutiny-of-fox-news-reporter-james-rosen-in-leak-case-draws-fire/2013/05/20/c6289eba-c162-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_story.html
In response to questions about how Rosen was characterized in the affidavit, the Justice Department said in a statement Monday: “Saying that there is probable cause to believe that someone has committed a crime and charging the person with that crime are two different things.”
Looks like weve gone from Obamacare to Obamascare
Remember how this admins spent more money than all the rest in history combined?
Well, being consistent:
The Obama administration has pursued more leak investigations under the 1917 Espionage Act than all previous administrations combined
And they said tricky Dick was paranoid
In the affidavit, FBI agent Reginald Reyes said Rosen “asked, solicited and encouraged Mr. Kim to disclose sensitive United States internal documents and intelligence information.” He added, “The reporter did so by employing flattery and playing to Mr. Kim’s vanity and ego.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/justice-departments-scrutiny-of-fox-news-reporter-james-rosen-in-leak-case-draws-fire/2013/05/20/c6289eba-c162-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_story.html
In response to questions about how Rosen was characterized in the affidavit, the Justice Department said in a statement Monday: “Saying that there is probable cause to believe that someone has committed a crime and charging the person with that crime are two different things.”
Looks like weve gone from Obamacare to Obamascare
Remember how this admins spent more money than all the rest in history combined?
Well, being consistent:
The Obama administration has pursued more leak investigations under the 1917 Espionage Act than all previous administrations combined
And they said tricky Dick was paranoid
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
There has been a change.
Instead of "I dont know" "I found out when you did" "I was not involved in that" "I dont know"
We now have "I plead the fifth"
Instead of "I dont know" "I found out when you did" "I was not involved in that" "I dont know"
We now have "I plead the fifth"
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Where everyones a god, whether local or national, its beginning to look like Mt Olympus here.
Im sure most IRS people arent used to having to answer questions instead of demanding answers to their own.
I could see that in Millers attitude earlier, the very contempt for congress, as if they meant anything.
I give him credit at least for saying "I dont know" "I told the truth" etc statements, which were proved wrong , and will be even proven wrong moreso down the line.
Evidently, in the James Rosen situation, it wasnt just him either, according to Fox.
So, we have a justice dept that wont uphold the law on political reasonings, tho we cant disobey it for the same.
We have the IRS going after groups of people wanting smaller government, as the largest expansion ever seen in government, Obamacare is not only created, but a large portion, and the enforceable portion of it is given over to the IRS, and a person partially responsible at the time of the IRS' indescretions is put at the helm of this.
We have the justice dept going after the press for doing their jobs, for simply asking for answers, and being placed as contributors to so called corruption and law breaking, yet as they attack the press, surely dumbed down by such actions, the prez completely buys their info as to whats going on when he learns of much of this thru the dumbed down media for the first time?
I have it right so far?
Im sure most IRS people arent used to having to answer questions instead of demanding answers to their own.
I could see that in Millers attitude earlier, the very contempt for congress, as if they meant anything.
I give him credit at least for saying "I dont know" "I told the truth" etc statements, which were proved wrong , and will be even proven wrong moreso down the line.
Evidently, in the James Rosen situation, it wasnt just him either, according to Fox.
So, we have a justice dept that wont uphold the law on political reasonings, tho we cant disobey it for the same.
We have the IRS going after groups of people wanting smaller government, as the largest expansion ever seen in government, Obamacare is not only created, but a large portion, and the enforceable portion of it is given over to the IRS, and a person partially responsible at the time of the IRS' indescretions is put at the helm of this.
We have the justice dept going after the press for doing their jobs, for simply asking for answers, and being placed as contributors to so called corruption and law breaking, yet as they attack the press, surely dumbed down by such actions, the prez completely buys their info as to whats going on when he learns of much of this thru the dumbed down media for the first time?
I have it right so far?
musical marv
Distinguished
- Feb 26, 2011
- 2,396
- 0
- 20,810
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Its a setup.
Even people that adopted kids must be conservatives, oh noes, all is lost.
And if you didnt know about them, then you arent following along very well
Then theres this guy and his dad
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2405459469001/franklin-graham-how-the-irs-targeted-my-religious-charities/
Timing and delays, hmm that and the IRS are the only consistencies, besides political positions, or perceived ones anyways
Even people that adopted kids must be conservatives, oh noes, all is lost.
And if you didnt know about them, then you arent following along very well
Then theres this guy and his dad
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2405459469001/franklin-graham-how-the-irs-targeted-my-religious-charities/
Timing and delays, hmm that and the IRS are the only consistencies, besides political positions, or perceived ones anyways
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
This isnt an argument here is it?
Letting the government have such power?
Just say yes, you want the government to have such power or not.
If not, then all politics asside, someones going to jail, and depending on how far up the ladder it goes, so should be the penalties.
Again, regardless of politics.
If it goes to the WH, then it goes there, if it sits on top of the president, so it does.
Not wanting it to shouldnt change a thing.
I dont want it to, I would hope our president isnt involved, as it was sad days when Nixon left in disgrace, and I was liberal back in the day, knew and used all the hippy speak I see today as well.
What has to be done has to be done
Letting the government have such power?
Just say yes, you want the government to have such power or not.
If not, then all politics asside, someones going to jail, and depending on how far up the ladder it goes, so should be the penalties.
Again, regardless of politics.
If it goes to the WH, then it goes there, if it sits on top of the president, so it does.
Not wanting it to shouldnt change a thing.
I dont want it to, I would hope our president isnt involved, as it was sad days when Nixon left in disgrace, and I was liberal back in the day, knew and used all the hippy speak I see today as well.
What has to be done has to be done
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Now the president is saying we are turning a page in regards to terrorism, yet with Ft Hood and Boston, thereve been more attacks than weve seen in awhile?
Does anything he say trustworthy?
Looking at London and France, my guess is no.
Looking at Sweden and Australia, my guess is no.
He wont even call attacks acts of Muslim extremists acts of terrorism by Muslim extremists.
Just a hint to those who like this poor handling of these things, just because you say something doesnt make it so, like knowing when everyone else found out, as in watching TV.
Denying/omitting Muslim extreme terrorism is quite healthy throughout the globe, as in not knowing about Benghazi or the IRS or the huge wide open book on the bugging of the media looking for leaks, yes, the leaks on.... you guessed it, terrorism.
Theres much more, but I want people to read this, and not overwhelm them with facts.
Does anything he say trustworthy?
Looking at London and France, my guess is no.
Looking at Sweden and Australia, my guess is no.
He wont even call attacks acts of Muslim extremists acts of terrorism by Muslim extremists.
Just a hint to those who like this poor handling of these things, just because you say something doesnt make it so, like knowing when everyone else found out, as in watching TV.
Denying/omitting Muslim extreme terrorism is quite healthy throughout the globe, as in not knowing about Benghazi or the IRS or the huge wide open book on the bugging of the media looking for leaks, yes, the leaks on.... you guessed it, terrorism.
Theres much more, but I want people to read this, and not overwhelm them with facts.
musical marv
Distinguished
- Feb 26, 2011
- 2,396
- 0
- 20,810
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Well, the republicans have been blamed for politicizing a few of these things, and accusing the president for Benghazi, Boston etc because he wont speak directly to the problem, terrorism, since its supposedly on the run and way diminished.
Today he said we turn a page from this, as if it were all but over, or something we should just get used to or whatever hes saying with regards to reality.
So, fact, hes been claiming terrorism is over, like the republicans have said, hes hidden this in his speeches continually, fact, and yet the republicans still get blamed, terrorism continues, and today, once again, we get the wrong message from our president.
If its the same old facts marv, maybe the president should try to embrace them, instead of making us look bad and him a fool, while bolstering our enemies all at the same time.
Today he said we turn a page from this, as if it were all but over, or something we should just get used to or whatever hes saying with regards to reality.
So, fact, hes been claiming terrorism is over, like the republicans have said, hes hidden this in his speeches continually, fact, and yet the republicans still get blamed, terrorism continues, and today, once again, we get the wrong message from our president.
If its the same old facts marv, maybe the president should try to embrace them, instead of making us look bad and him a fool, while bolstering our enemies all at the same time.
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Comey was critical of Clinton's pardons and Eric Holder's pardon recommendation.[16] According to Rich's attorney, Holder advised to circumvent standard procedures and to submit the pardon petition directly to the White House.[17]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich
Critics complained that Denise Rich, his former wife, had made substantial donations to both the Clinton library and to Mrs. Clinton's senate campaign. According to Paul Volcker's independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels (640,000 m3) of oil.[21] Longtime Clinton supporters and Democratic leaders such as former President Jimmy Carter, James Carville and Terry McAuliffe, were all critical of the Clinton pardon. Carter said the pardons were "disgraceful."[22]
So, remember, fair share, as in, share some of that $ with the dems, have Holder work it over, and its all fair
PS Look whos heading the FBI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich
Critics complained that Denise Rich, his former wife, had made substantial donations to both the Clinton library and to Mrs. Clinton's senate campaign. According to Paul Volcker's independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels (640,000 m3) of oil.[21] Longtime Clinton supporters and Democratic leaders such as former President Jimmy Carter, James Carville and Terry McAuliffe, were all critical of the Clinton pardon. Carter said the pardons were "disgraceful."[22]
So, remember, fair share, as in, share some of that $ with the dems, have Holder work it over, and its all fair
PS Look whos heading the FBI
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
So, from Scooter Libby on down to Holder, theyve all been in bed with one another, have dirt on each other, and are all sharing in ruling the roost.
I remember what this guy said, another guy that the president, tho surrounded by his words, never heard them til we all saw them.... on TV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=208t80uceSg
I remember what this guy said, another guy that the president, tho surrounded by his words, never heard them til we all saw them.... on TV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=208t80uceSg
musical marv
Distinguished
- Feb 26, 2011
- 2,396
- 0
- 20,810
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/04/25/epa-official-our-philosophy-is-to-crucify-in-order-to-pacify/
Just a reminder of and on our beloevd government, and dont forget Gibson guitar
Just a reminder of and on our beloevd government, and dont forget Gibson guitar
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Now, lets go back to the Ft Hood shooter, who wants to defend himself.
As is well known, this was to be taken as a workplace violence description instead of an act of terrorism, as deemed by the BO admin.
The consequences are, those that were shot and lived, do not get battle pay, since it was deemed workplace violence, and their injuries and such arent covered under the military as it would if deemed an act of terrorism.
This has caused many of the victims to go without a few things because of this declaration as such.
Meanwhile, this Major Hassan who did the killings and injuries/shootings has decided to defend himself in court, yes in court, because, its deemed as a workplace violence scenario.
So, in court, the wording will be recorded for all to see and hear, so, anyone whos worried about things getting out to rile up those inclined with the Majors way of thinking now has great opportunity to hear it and do so.
If this were a terrorist attack, it would then be a military matter, with military courts, and the words of the trial would then be held incommunicado .
Now, the reasons so far, stated by the Major, since at least this is open and transparent, are that the Major needed to do something to stop those troops from harming the known terrorists/leaders.
So, in the end, protecting a election by deeming terrorism is dead is stepping on the graves of those killed by this act and abroad, is purely foolhardy as seen by this unsettled "worker" and his words
As is well known, this was to be taken as a workplace violence description instead of an act of terrorism, as deemed by the BO admin.
The consequences are, those that were shot and lived, do not get battle pay, since it was deemed workplace violence, and their injuries and such arent covered under the military as it would if deemed an act of terrorism.
This has caused many of the victims to go without a few things because of this declaration as such.
Meanwhile, this Major Hassan who did the killings and injuries/shootings has decided to defend himself in court, yes in court, because, its deemed as a workplace violence scenario.
So, in court, the wording will be recorded for all to see and hear, so, anyone whos worried about things getting out to rile up those inclined with the Majors way of thinking now has great opportunity to hear it and do so.
If this were a terrorist attack, it would then be a military matter, with military courts, and the words of the trial would then be held incommunicado .
Now, the reasons so far, stated by the Major, since at least this is open and transparent, are that the Major needed to do something to stop those troops from harming the known terrorists/leaders.
So, in the end, protecting a election by deeming terrorism is dead is stepping on the graves of those killed by this act and abroad, is purely foolhardy as seen by this unsettled "worker" and his words
wanamingo
Distinguished
- Jan 21, 2011
- 2,984
- 1
- 20,810
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
The U.S. government has obtained a top secret court order that requires Verizon to turn over the telephone records of millions of Americans to the National Security Agency on an "ongoing daily basis," the UK-based Guardian newspaper reported Wednesday.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/05/politics/nsa-verizon-records/index.html
”He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.”
http://www.whatourforefathersthought.com/Quotes.html
Firstly, looks like police state soft coming, with Im sure more to come, as even the press and congress are not exempt from big brother, as well as those farmers and those drones overhead, go EPA, which is also the Gibson guitar companies harassers.
IRS, harassment, EPA, harassment , NSA, harassment, and the talking points is now on the economy, where its getting better after the sequestration.
Yea mingo, I would have to call it that, as their own people do the same to them, and we all call it terrorism.
If one of us does it to anyone else, here at home or abroad, so it is.
To stop the what ifs, WHEN we leave all these places, terrorism wont stop there or here.
A better example is Tim McVeigh, where he too was against the government here, and those working for it, and this includes the military as well.
Yes, he was a terrorist.
Yes, he used terorism to further his beliefs
PS
If Obama says he just heard about this the other day as well, he needs to go.
He has to acknowledge this for once, and why as Im sure its not only Verizon, he insists invading our privacy, where he has the right to do so in such broad strokes.
Its time to quit playing dodgeball, put on the big boy pants and explain all these things to the people.
Cause if he doesnt, and sends someone else out, it wont work, no matter how well they end up being promoted
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/05/politics/nsa-verizon-records/index.html
”He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.”
http://www.whatourforefathersthought.com/Quotes.html
Firstly, looks like police state soft coming, with Im sure more to come, as even the press and congress are not exempt from big brother, as well as those farmers and those drones overhead, go EPA, which is also the Gibson guitar companies harassers.
IRS, harassment, EPA, harassment , NSA, harassment, and the talking points is now on the economy, where its getting better after the sequestration.
Yea mingo, I would have to call it that, as their own people do the same to them, and we all call it terrorism.
If one of us does it to anyone else, here at home or abroad, so it is.
To stop the what ifs, WHEN we leave all these places, terrorism wont stop there or here.
A better example is Tim McVeigh, where he too was against the government here, and those working for it, and this includes the military as well.
Yes, he was a terrorist.
Yes, he used terorism to further his beliefs
PS
If Obama says he just heard about this the other day as well, he needs to go.
He has to acknowledge this for once, and why as Im sure its not only Verizon, he insists invading our privacy, where he has the right to do so in such broad strokes.
Its time to quit playing dodgeball, put on the big boy pants and explain all these things to the people.
Cause if he doesnt, and sends someone else out, it wont work, no matter how well they end up being promoted
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Now, theres also this:
PRISM by the Numbers: A Guide to the Government’s Secret Internet Data-Mining Program
Read more: http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/06/06/prism-by-the-numbers-a-guide-to-the-governments-secret-internet-data-mining-program/#ixzz2VUQamiRZ
One day after The Guardian revealed that the U.S. government has been secretly collecting call log data from millions of Verizon customers, The Washington Post reported Thursday that the government’s monitoring of American’s data goes much, much deeper. The FBI and the National Security Agency are mining the servers of the country’s biggest technology companies for the purpose of hunting spies and terrorists. The program, code-named PRISM, is massive in scope and involves web services that many Americans use every day.
Microsoft (September 2007)
Yahoo (March 2008)
Google (January 2009)
Facebook (June 2009)
PalTalk (December 2009)
YouTube (September 2010)
Skype (February 2011)
AOL (March 2011)
Apple (October 2012)
The above is a list of whos doing it, and when they started.
Now, before we get things out of context here, who cares about Bush, republicans, libs, BO etc.
This is happening as I type this 😉
Are we at least united against this atrocity ?
PRISM by the Numbers: A Guide to the Government’s Secret Internet Data-Mining Program
Read more: http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/06/06/prism-by-the-numbers-a-guide-to-the-governments-secret-internet-data-mining-program/#ixzz2VUQamiRZ
One day after The Guardian revealed that the U.S. government has been secretly collecting call log data from millions of Verizon customers, The Washington Post reported Thursday that the government’s monitoring of American’s data goes much, much deeper. The FBI and the National Security Agency are mining the servers of the country’s biggest technology companies for the purpose of hunting spies and terrorists. The program, code-named PRISM, is massive in scope and involves web services that many Americans use every day.
Microsoft (September 2007)
Yahoo (March 2008)
Google (January 2009)
Facebook (June 2009)
PalTalk (December 2009)
YouTube (September 2010)
Skype (February 2011)
AOL (March 2011)
Apple (October 2012)
The above is a list of whos doing it, and when they started.
Now, before we get things out of context here, who cares about Bush, republicans, libs, BO etc.
This is happening as I type this 😉
Are we at least united against this atrocity ?
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Obama Administration Has "Lost All Credibility,' New York Times
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/obama_administration_has_lost_all_credibility_new_york_times_admonishes_201/
So, it appears its Bushes fault once again
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/obama_administration_has_lost_all_credibility_new_york_times_admonishes_201/
So, it appears its Bushes fault once again
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
Remember this?
Make White House Communications Public: Obama will amend executive orders to ensure that
communications about regulatory policymaking between persons outside government and all White House
staff are disclosed to the public
http://www.miafscme.org/PDF%20Files/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf
“The cost of our debt is one of the fastest growing expenses in the
federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing
our cities and states of critical investments in infrastructure like
bridges, ports, and levees; robbing our families and our children of
critical investments in education and health care reform; robbing our
seniors of the retirement and health security they have counted on. … If
Washington were serious about honest tax relief in this country, we’d see
an effort to reduce our national debt by returning to responsible fiscal
policies.”
– Barack Obama, Speech in the U.S. Senate, March 13, 2006
Read this and see what we really have
PS Notice who backed this as well
Make White House Communications Public: Obama will amend executive orders to ensure that
communications about regulatory policymaking between persons outside government and all White House
staff are disclosed to the public
http://www.miafscme.org/PDF%20Files/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf
“The cost of our debt is one of the fastest growing expenses in the
federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing
our cities and states of critical investments in infrastructure like
bridges, ports, and levees; robbing our families and our children of
critical investments in education and health care reform; robbing our
seniors of the retirement and health security they have counted on. … If
Washington were serious about honest tax relief in this country, we’d see
an effort to reduce our national debt by returning to responsible fiscal
policies.”
– Barack Obama, Speech in the U.S. Senate, March 13, 2006
Read this and see what we really have
PS Notice who backed this as well
- Aug 23, 2006
- 19,840
- 0
- 50,860
TRENDING THREADS
-
News AMD says Intel's 'horrible product' is causing Ryzen 9 9800X3D shortages- Started by Admin
- Replies: 69
-
-
-
News Jensen says DLSS 4 "predicts the future" to increase framerates without introducing latency
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 77
-
News Nvidia's GeForce RTX 5070 at $549 — How does it stack up to the previous generation RTX 4070?
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 75
-
Question Motherboard DRAM light stays on after changing CPU cooler- Started by Lvl99Toaster
- Replies: 4
-
Discussion PSU recommendations and power supply discussion thread - Tom's hardware- Started by Darkbreeze
- Replies: 2K
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram