Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (
More info?)
"BelaLvgosi" <nononono@nonono.com> wrote in message
news:newscache$qa0fxh$sg6$1@newsfront4.netvisao.pt...
>
> "empireAA" <nobody@NOSPAMSPAMSUX.com> wrote in message
> news:ITbnc.538260$B81.9887819@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
> >
> > "PRIVATE1964" <private1964@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:20040508125953.11161.00000914@mb-m14.aol.com...
> > > I don't think it's an 8X card for sure.
> > >
> > > It might be 2X or 4X.
> > >
> > > Download Sisoft Sandra it should tell you what it is.
> > >
> >
> > If it's an M64 it definetly is 2x. The M64 is a dumbed down version of
the
> > regular TNT2. The worst out of all the old TNT chipsets.
> >
> >
>
> No, as far as I remember most m64 and m64 pros were 4x since they came
later
> (sorry if I'm wrong), I had an elsa erazor III lt wich surely was. And
btw,
> a good m64 with 2gb (I remember elsas and a few others had) mem bandwith
as
> most pro's instead of 1.2 standard could outperform easily a tnt1 with
stock
> speeds. The slowest tnt2 was the vanta lt for pci, a m64 even souped down.
>
>
>
Agreed, the M64's were faster than the TNT. What I meant to say was as far
as the general architecture of the cards according to the timeframe they
were made that the M64's were the worst designed.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram