Nvidia Fermi GF108 GPU Die Shots Leaked Too

[kelemvor4]

[citation][nom]rhino13[/nom]So nVidia has more leaks than a three day old diaper.Isn't it about time heads started rolling over there?[/citation]

The question is, do they really care. This isn't exactly bad publicity, and it's free.

 

[kilthas_th]

Anyone else hoping this makes a sufficiently powerful Physx 3.0 capable add-in card for dedicated physics?

 

[rohitbaran]

[citation][nom]eddieroolz[/nom]Wow, NV may have delayed Fermi for a long time but now that the first few chips are out, the floodgates have opened wide![/citation]
nVidia should pray that SI is not too fast for its Fermi or they will themselves be swept in their flood. 😀

 

[reprotected]

It better run faster than the 9600 GT if it will become the GeForce 410.

This is how it SHOULD work:

GX2 495 = GTX 480 SLI (with GTX 460 efficiency)
GTX 485 = GTX 460 SLI (700 watts)
GTX 475 = GTX 480 (650 watts)
GTX 460 = HD5830 OC'd (550 watts)
GTS 450 = HD5830 (500 watts)
GTS 445 = HD5770 (450 watts)
GT 440 = HD5750 (420 watts)
GT 430 = HD4770 (400 watts)
GT 420 = 9800 GT (350 watts)
G410 = 9600 GSO (220 watts) =D

 

[feeddagoat]

DDR3.....WHY?!

Its cheaper and likely that the card won't need the bandwidth of DDR4 or DDR5 since its a budget card

 

[dragonsqrrl]

[citation][nom]reprotected[/nom]It better run faster than the 9600 GT if it will become the GeForce 410.This is how it SHOULD work:GX2 495 = GTX 480 SLI (with GTX 460 efficiency)GTX 485 = GTX 460 SLI (700 watts)GTX 475 = GTX 480 (650 watts)GTX 460 = HD5830 OC'd (550 watts)GTS 450 = HD5830 (500 watts)GTS 445 = HD5770 (450 watts)GT 440 = HD5750 (420 watts)GT 430 = HD4770 (400 watts)GT 420 = 9800 GT (350 watts)G410 = 9600 GSO (220 watts) =D[/citation]
This is could be pretty misleading. It's an oversimplification of both the current and upcoming graphics card lineup. Could you maybe explain how you're getting the wattage 'estimates' for all these cards? How does a GTX460/HD5830 consume 550W? Or are you trying to say that these would be the type of PSU's you would need to run them?...lol. And how does the rumored GTX490 with 2x gf104's perform on par with with the GTX480 in SLI with 2x gf100's? Some questionable information you have here.

 

[dEAne]

For a video card their should be a cheaper model or it won't stand longer in the market.

 

[reprotected]

This is could be pretty misleading. It's an oversimplification of both the current and upcoming graphics card lineup. Could you maybe explain how you're getting the wattage 'estimates' for all these cards? How does a GTX460/HD5830 consume 550W? Or are you trying to say that these would be the type of PSU's you would need to run them?...lol. And how does the rumored GTX490 with 2x gf104's perform on par with with the GTX480 in SLI with 2x gf100's? Some questionable information you have here.

What I am trying to say is that it BETTER run like that. Imagine it like this:

"The product" = compariable product by performance (PSU requirement of "the product")

So like when I say something like:

GTX 475 = GTX 480 (650 watts), that means that the product GTX 475 should perform like the GTX 480 but requiring only a 650 watt power supply. I am not saying that it WILL perform like that, just something that Nvidia could do to make a GOOD Fermi.