James Mason
Titan
jeffler383 :
2 part question: I have 2 980's in SLI running a 1440P monitor. That's obviously plenty of graphical horsepower to push that resolution on ultra everything with almost nothing going below 60fps.
It's not the raw graphical power that's getting me, it's the sometimes issues I run into with SLI. It's not much, but it's still there and I can notice it on some games. However, it's not enough for me to be willing to take a loss on a new card, unless it's a serious upgrade. So, since the reference 1080 gets in the neighborhood of 90-95% of 2 980's would it be better to go that route for a single card solution with one of the factory OC from MSI, etc., or wait for the ti?
OR with the new HB sli bridges would 2 1070's be the better cost/performance option with the premise of improved SLI scalability and smoother gameplay?
It's not the raw graphical power that's getting me, it's the sometimes issues I run into with SLI. It's not much, but it's still there and I can notice it on some games. However, it's not enough for me to be willing to take a loss on a new card, unless it's a serious upgrade. So, since the reference 1080 gets in the neighborhood of 90-95% of 2 980's would it be better to go that route for a single card solution with one of the factory OC from MSI, etc., or wait for the ti?
OR with the new HB sli bridges would 2 1070's be the better cost/performance option with the premise of improved SLI scalability and smoother gameplay?
This reminds me, I'd also be interested in seeing the 1080s/1070s in comparison to the gtx 900s in SLI and the r9 300s in Xfire, just to get a comprehensive coverage of where these cards fall.
Also because SLI and Crossfire have so many issues, want to see recent and combined results showing some of their downsides.