News Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 8GB struggles due to lack of VRAM — and not just at 4K ultra

Probably low availability because they only really released it in order to be able to claim to have a low cost option. It seems to be burned silicon for no good purpose at a time when silicon is in high demand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artk2219
honestly amd releasing an 8gb 9060 is gonna be a gut punch...they knew in 2020 that 6gb was not enoguh and put 8gb+ on everything....and they should also know that 8gb in 2025 is same..it shouldnt exist.
It should exist... for $150 or less.

8 GB 6600 XTish cards have experienced price stagnation, often well over $200 throughout their time on the market. Now with production ended, RX 7600s are around $280+ on ebay, and even worse on Newegg.

8 GB RX 9060 XT will be faster than the 7600, and perhaps the 5060, but with the VRAM limitation and I assume no less than $300 MSRP.
 
Soooooo, don't set textures to very high? Problem solved, eh?

For the price it costs, it absolutely should have more VRAM. But this is cherry-picking workloads that maximize the amount of VRAM needed in order to make 8 GB look bad.
You also have to turn off DLSS, RT, and FG, as those features also eat into VRAM.
And then at that point, the card ceases to be useful.
 
You also have to turn off DLSS, RT, and FG, as those features also eat into VRAM.
And then at that point, the card ceases to be useful.
I don't have any interest in DLSS or frame generation, and only have interest in ray-tracing insofar as it does not come at the cost of smooth gameplay or pristine image quality. So I wouldn't mind having an 8 GB 5060 Ti. Would be a nice upgrade to my 1660 Super. But it's too expensive for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artk2219
Memory is cheap, 8GB should not exist.

12GB minimum on everything.
Actually, Nvidia claimed that 12 GB is expensive... when using 3 GB modules on 128-bit. Because the memory is new.

But it's not a great excuse because they could have waited a few months to launch 12 GB versions of the 5060 and 5060 Ti. It wouldn't have been the first time there was a long time gap between the 90/80 and 60 cards.
 
Okay, so go buy an EVGA 1080Ti.
If I ever buy a new graphics card, it'll probably be one made by Intel, assuming they're still making them by then and still represent as good of a value proposition as they do now (theoretically, at MSRP). I prefer not to buy used components, and a 1080 Ti also is too power-hungry and doesn't quite represent the >=2x rasterization peformance upgrade I'd be looking for in a replacement.

Right now (and for a good while longer, I expect) I'm still fine with my 1660 Super. Plus it's not a good time for anyone to upgrade because of the state of the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyaraM