One would have expected the author of the original story would at least do some due diligence and either wait for someone to validate the "unlocker", or do it on an isolated, disposable testbed, before actually linking to it. Instead, they just helped spread malware.
For a moment, I feel like it was the early 00s again, when early techsites just linked to what they thought was a safe program, only to later find out it was malware-infested. Which then led to tech sites that actually did some prior research on the programs before linking it in recommendations or suggestions.