Nvidia's GeForce GTX 275 Specs Revealed

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]chris13th[/nom]Nvidia's naming scheme is so bass ackwards.[/citation]

I agree. I bet the 4890 is going to be stronger then the 275, not being a fanboy here, im planning to get a GTX 260 SSC, but if the 4890 comes out in time im going to get it, or the GTX 275, whichever is better.
 
I think they mean it looks like the same gpu used in the GTX295, not that it is the same card. They later say that it is a single gpu, dual slot card. Thus, it seams to be half of a GTX295, making it more powerful than the GTX260 216, but weaker than the GTX285. How it stacks against the the GTX280 would be hard to tell, as the GTX280 would have the same amount of shading power, but a lower clock with a better memory interface. My guess, seeing as the memory interface isn't significantly different (448 versus 512), would be it would outperform the GTX280 by just a hair. However, if someone were to finally get GDDR5 running on an nVidia card, who knows what the results would be?
 
[citation][nom]Dreasconse[/nom]275>295?watch as people say they don't want a 275 because the 295 is better.[/citation]
Isn't the 295 a dual GPU and the 275 a single GPU? I think that is the difference. The 295 will perform better. I think you are confusing the 295 with 285. Sounds like the 275>285
 
I hate that both companies have 349 cards each, all within 10% performance of one another… Like let’s put some of this cash into making better cards already instead having 13 price lvl’s.

Example:
ATI has a 4870x2, 4870, 4850… good enough already! Ati should crush the 4870x2 and then the 4870 will be the “low” end as they can discontinue the 4850. We just don’t need 23423423424 cards from one company.
(Perhaps 4 price lvl’s is ideal??)
 
[citation][nom]Radio_Active[/nom]BTW Im running a 8800GTX still runs great no need to upgrade yet.[/citation]
I bought that card the day it came out for WAY to much cash. It is a legendary card in my mind, king of the hill for almost two years, and still a pretty decent mid-range card.
 
I can't stand to watch Nvidia release more and more renamed or reclocked cards. They're doing it to give themselves time with the GT300 series I'm sure.

The real question is - is it a good business move? You nudge the performance up a little bit and give it a new name, so people spend money on that - and possibly don't have enough by the time the next series releases.
 
[citation][nom]grieve[/nom]I hate that both companies have 349 cards each, all within 10% performance of one another… Like let’s put some of this cash into making better cards already instead having 13 price lvl’s.Example:ATI has a 4870x2, 4870, 4850… good enough already! Ati should crush the 4870x2 and then the 4870 will be the “low” end as they can discontinue the 4850. We just don’t need 23423423424 cards from one company. (Perhaps 4 price lvl’s is ideal??)[/citation]

When they make the gpus and some dont run at the clocks they want (for example) they can lower the clocks and sell it as a weaker GPU (eg 4830 = 4850 = 4870), same as RPL's etc - chips are binned in ranks etc
 
I think the 275 is just going to be a slightly lower clocked 285 with a 448bit interface like the 260. If it comes too close to the performance of the 285 then nVidia risks cannibalizing 285 sales, not that they are exactly spectacular right now as it is.
 
[citation][nom]RiotSniperX[/nom]And adding to my comment up top, its going to come down to pure Price/Performance.[/citation]
Agreed. I tend to go with AMD, because lately they seem to be superior in that department. The 4890 will more than likely be my card of choice, unless something terrible with the new card happens. *cough 3800 series* if that's the case, i will just crossfire my 4850 and call it good for a while.
 
[citation][nom]apache_lives[/nom]When they make the gpus and some dont run at the clocks they want (for example) they can lower the clocks and sell it as a weaker GPU (eg 4830 = 4850 = 4870), same as RPL's etc - chips are binned in ranks etc[/citation]
I am fully aware of this. I still do not see why there would ever be a need to have so many different price levels.

Anything more than four or five cards from a single company is not doing the consumer any justice. Sure you and I walk into the local computer store and can rank the cards by name, but how many people can actually do this? 5%, if lucky!

Nvidia and ATI are not only using different “binned” cards, they are literally changing the clocks, up or down a couple %, slapping a new name on them and in some cases simply just renaming and filling the shelves with more of the same product. I cannot understand how the consumer gains from this.

I think “JOE BLOW” should be able to walk in the local computer store and make a choice between five cards from ATI, low-high and five from Nvidia… there is no reason why a person should have to b hardware expert to make a proper decision.
 
So is this going to boil down to a 4890 vs. GTX 275?

From what nVidia's naming scheme suggests, I think it would be 4890 vs. GTX 285. But it would be odd if the 275 is stronger than 285..
 
i am really hoping that they both release at the same time and the 4890 comes on top for more affordable prices ( gtx 285 price cut any1 ? ).
 
I don't get it.
More cards = more choice
If you don't like choice or are too confused then buy a dell xps or something and let someone make the choices for you.
These are the same people who fuss over cpu steppings and obscure bios settings, yet can't handle more gpus.
295>285>275>260>250
what's so hard about that?
 
@ anonymous: The article was phrased weirdly, it's one of the single gpus in a GTX 295, with slightly higher clocks. From the article, it sounds like it is more powerful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom