Question Oddly low benchmark

SpiralScrub

Honorable
Dec 6, 2019
11
1
10,515
So I was looking into how to overclock my CPU, when I noticed the benchmark is much lower than the average I was seeing online
CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 4GHz
RAM - 24GB - 3000MHz

I saw online benchmarks at 3.7GHz getting a score on Cinebench of 1617 points, my benchmark at 3.7GHz is 482 points. Any idea why it's performing so poorly?

For reference, my power mode is set to High Performance, and the temp during the benchmarks was 67c
My other components:
GPU - Radeon RX 7700 XT
Motherboard - STRIX B450-F GAMING
 
Last edited:
Is your system identical to those other systems in ALL respects? If not then you cannot possibly expect the same results.
No it's not, but I looked at 10s of benchmarks with varied setups, some had less powerful components than me & they still pulled a score over 1000. Having less than a 3rd of the average seems too much a deficit to ignore.
 
Which software did you use to monitor clock speed? FWIW Task Manager reports Ryzen clock speed incorrectly. The most plausible reason for the deficit is clock speed, or you have lots (and lots) of background tasks. Personally I use Ryzen Master, as it seems to be the only suite to report clock speed, temperature and power correctly and in real time. HWiNFO does an OK job too but I prefer the histogram setup that RM can show.
 
Which software did you use to monitor clock speed? FWIW Task Manager reports Ryzen clock speed incorrectly. The most plausible reason for the deficit is clock speed, or you have lots (and lots) of background tasks. Personally I use Ryzen Master, as it seems to be the only suite to report clock speed, temperature and power correctly and in real time. HWiNFO does an OK job too but I prefer the histogram setup that RM can show.
I got my clock speed from the bios on startup, so I don't think that could've been reported incorrectly, as for background tasks, I can try Ryzen Master tomorrow & make sure there's not much running. That said, I don't think there was much running when I ran my benchmarks anyways since I did it on startup.
 
I got my clock speed from the bios on startup, so I don't think that could've been reported incorrectly, as for background tasks, I can try Ryzen Master tomorrow & make sure there's not much running. That said, I don't think there was much running when I ran my benchmarks anyways since I did it on startup.
BIOS shows only what is set to do and it's not under any load like it is when benchmarking. In single core benchmark you can see what frequencies cores are capable of. It should be higher than all core by few hundred MHz.
 
BIOS shows only what is set to do and it's not under any load like it is when benchmarking. In single core benchmark you can see what frequencies cores are capable of. It should be higher than all core by few hundred MHz.
I ran the single core benchmark, I got 35 points, I'm quite confused
 
Which software did you use to monitor clock speed? FWIW Task Manager reports Ryzen clock speed incorrectly. The most plausible reason for the deficit is clock speed, or you have lots (and lots) of background tasks. Personally I use Ryzen Master, as it seems to be the only suite to report clock speed, temperature and power correctly and in real time. HWiNFO does an OK job too but I prefer the histogram setup that RM can show.
I installed Ryzen Master, it shows my Core speed is 3.7GHz, but it also shows my Memory clock is at 1500Mhz (I checked in the bios before booting, it's set to 3000Mhz, I'm sorry if I'm missing something but these readings feel all over the place.
 
Which benchmark ? Cine bench 15 ? 20 ? 23 ? 2024 ? they all show different scores.
2024, that's what I've been using for benchmarking since the start just for reference. That does solve the dramatically different score thanks for clarifying that there's different versions.

Other than that, is there anything I can do about my memory clock speed? Ryzen Master showing it's at 1500Mhz instead of the 3000Mhz it's set at in bios is a bit concerning. Task Manager shows it as 3000 so maybe Ryzen Master is just wrong?
 
Last edited: