so its an overpriced netbook thats somehow more expensive and with less battery life despite its lack of a usable built in screen and the standalone capability that it would provide? The atom won't be able to handle much of any flash, except the lowest of quality maybe. The graphics chipset wouldnt be able to play even 720p videos, unless with coreavc, and even then it wouldnt be smooth. Either way, watching any sort of streamed/HD media would drain the battery in 2 hours tops, given that the max is 4 hours (probably measured when just browsing or typing word docs, or when totally idle).
I usually love Asus' products, but these are horrible specs, horrible design, horrible price. Who is this supposed to appeal to? ppl who want to browse the internet at netbook speeds on a hdtv? it sure doesnt work as a home theater pc or anything media related.