[citation][nom]alidan[/nom]this guy deserves a patent, but here let me chime in on this one"Using 3,4,5,6 7 Fingers for multi-touch tracking"if there is a company that developed a way to use more than 2 fingers, and they want a patent on that tech, than they also deserve it, because if they make the tech, and it works should they allow others to have what they made for free? no, they should licences it out, and only make it free if they really want to. there is a reason multi touch only has 2 fingers, and it was hard to even get those 2 to play nice.[/citation]
I agree, getting more than one finger to play nice was a change in the technology (went from resistive to capacitive touch panels, etc...). However to get more than 2 fingers to track simply involves tossing more computing power at the task, you don't need any new technology.
It's like people invented the computer, the internet, the modem, the web browser, etc... Some moron comes along and files a patent that basically reads "using a web browser on a computer connected to the internet with a modem to download data files". Believe it or not, they were granted that patent, I forget the name, but they started suing everyone offering movie, music, and video downloads (basically, any download that wasn't a webpage).
I feel patents should cover only technology (i.e. the servers and technology running OnLive), and not processes or concepts (i.e. Online Gaming in general, 4 finger tracking vs. 3 finger tracking). Unfortunately, patent trolls live off patenting ideas, and not actual working technology. I hate people who only come up with ideas and don't do any of the heavy lifting themselves.
Them: "Let's eat."
Me: "Where?"
Them: "I came up with the idea to eat, you figure out what, where, when, and how."
Me: "F-you!"