News Open-Source Windows Project Working to Integrate DirectX Support

ThomasKinsley

Prominent
Oct 4, 2023
209
204
460
Why not just run genuine Windows? It's pretty cheap. Why bother with this "I can't believe it's not Microsoft!" cheap knock-off version full of headaches?

Duplicating Windows was a sound idea when the project started in 1996 and Windows 95 was the most advanced version, but Linux, iOS/OSX, Android, BSD, and ChromeOS have come out and offer more utility in a better package. The project is a relic of a bygone era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P.Amini and ezst036

slightnitpick

Proper
Nov 2, 2023
134
88
160
Why not just run genuine Windows? It's pretty cheap. Why bother with this "I can't believe it's not Microsoft!" cheap knock-off version full of headaches?
For the people who want their OS to stop giving them the "latest and greatest" while removing or hiding functionality they've come to rely on. While still having security updates.

It gets old having to relearn or rehash options on someone else's schedule because your operating system vendor decided that now is a good time to change things that were working for you (this goes for Linux, too, as LTS versions are only supported for a brief period of time).

If you can role your own, it's no problem, but if you can role your own then you should already know that 95% of complaints don't apply to you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: snemarch

dimar

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2009
1,044
64
19,360
If this takes off, it would be nice to have some kind of Windows OS that can run on old computers all the way down to the first Pentiums (with SSDs of course) for most basic work, assuming the security is in order. There's going to be a lot of computer trash when Windows 10 support is ended, and this could be some kind of alternative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slightnitpick

snemarch

Distinguished
Feb 2, 2010
67
66
18,610
Why not just run genuine Windows? It's pretty cheap. Why bother with this "I can't believe it's not Microsoft!" cheap knock-off version full of headaches?
The point isn't "free" as in the monetary cost, but as in "open".

Also, aren't there interactions between the ReactOS, WINE and Proton projects?
 

zipspyder

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2014
69
30
18,560
All the people supporting this with "reasons" fail to comprehend we are going to be old and gone before ReactOS will be viable for any useful purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HaninTH

HaninTH

Proper
Oct 3, 2023
101
63
160
All the people supporting this with "reasons" fail to comprehend we are going to be old and gone before ReactOS will be viable for any useful purpose.
This. While it would have been nice to have an open source variant of Windows, the pace of development of this project will have a beta version ready by Windows 50, and by then, they'll be behind whatever new mechanism Microsoft has conceived to continue to bring in revenue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P.Amini

rambo919

Great
Sep 21, 2023
55
30
60
There are use cases for this, primarily people that don't want to use either Linux or a new version of Windows.

Future history could go either way really.