News OpenAI leadership rejects Elon Musk lawsuit – memo seen by reporters rebuts three main claims point by point

[Admin]

Senior OpenAI executives have circulated memos discussing the lawsuit Elon Musk’s lawyers filed in California on Thursday. One of the memos hints that the lawsuit may have been sparked by ‘Elon’s regrets’ in distancing himself from OpenAI a few years previously.

OpenAI leadership rejects Elon Musk lawsuit – memo seen by reporters rebuts three main claims point by point : Read more

 

[George³]

I suggest that management resign, leave ClosedAI, and permanently stop developing large language models in protest of the "false" of Elon's accusations and lawsuit filed. Of course, Sam Altman also needs to reduce the expected additions of $8 trillion to his personal fortune to zero.

 

[yahrightthere]

Headline: OpenAI leadership rejects Elon Musk lawsuit.
What was the expected response suppose to be, an admission of guilt, a statement saying "oh yeah we're guilty on all counts" Lets not go to court or argue with Musk.
I blame myself for falling for such tripe. I need to remind myself that most of what is written here is BS

 

[salgado18]

On the topic of AGIs and their danger to humanity, Kwon did a sidestep by claiming GPT-4 is quite a long way from being an AGI. As evidence of this, he defined an AGI as a “highly autonomous system capable enough to devise novel solutions to longstanding challenges.” However, Kwon asserted “GPT-4 can't do that.”

Yet?

Moreover, it was claimed the commercialization of the firm has delivered the capital to pay for vital guardrails for the technology.

Maybe Musk would have given you the money if you asked, and thus staying a non-profit?

OpenAI’s CSO asserted that it is up to him and the other leadership figures how they research, build, and run the company.

In other words, "it's our company and not yours, so we can do what we want with it."

They basically admit that Musk is right.

 

[chascho]

"GPT-4 can't do that" ... then what about q* ? Sounds like they are knowingly misleading people. We know q* exists. We also know it's not gtp4

 

[hotaru251]

Maybe Musk would have given you the money if you asked, and thus staying a non-profit?

ya...not smart there.

you never want to rely on 1 person to fudn yourself...as if they disagree and pull out you have no fallback.

In other words, "it's our company and not yours, so we can do what we want with it."

which is true.
Musk may not liek it but it is NOT his company.

They basically admit that Musk is right.

They didn't.
You are assuming stuff not stated. (and assuming is never good to do)

Musk has a widely known history of blaming others & lying for his benefit.

We know q* exists.

based on rumors/claims w/o actual proof.

also only thing rumored was it can do math programs outside what it was taught.

 

[Pierce2623]

OpenAI’s leading investor is actually a competitor? Me thinks you doth protest too much OpenAI.