News OpenWRT aims to finalize its $100 OpenWRT One open source router design and specification.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd pay more for better specs. One thing that jumps out at me is:
  • 2x RJ45 (2.5 GbE + 1 GbE)

Why?? Should be 2x 2.5 Gigabit.

Also, from what I can tell, the SoC has just 2x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.3 GHz.

I hope most of these parts have upgraded versions with compatible pinouts, so they can easily make a "turbo" model, for a higher price.

BTW, the article uses the term "firmware" to refer to the main operating software of the router, but various chips and embedded IP blocks also have their own firmware. I think the wifi chip is a prime example. I highly doubt that firmware is going to be open source. Hence, we're still stuck with some opaque, proprietary blobs of code running on this thing. That's not to say having open source for the main network stack isn't a good thing.
 
They should take a page from Turris' Mox expandable router, and go for a powerful basic module, that can be expanded as-needed via add-on modules, with options for SFP modules and additional 2.5 or even 5 GbE modules (at higher price points obviously) for the power users who'd be investing in such anyway.
 
This looks like an interesting device, Unfortunately for my project (EE Wi-Fi Autologin - GHub) a 3x3 2.4Ghx Radio minimum would be ideal (as a lot of the upstream devices i connect to in client mode are transmitting 2.4Ghz 3x3 ("BT Smart Hub" & Newer, "Home Hub 5" Models & older are still transmitting 2.4Ghz 2x2) with the varying distances & range often times only 2.4 is usable (Stable) and that 3rd stream really helps lower signal throughput (-75Dbm Approx 50-70Mbps)vs closer to 20-30), Rest of the specs look interesting though :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.