As for what he said, the first part of it was sound, cautious advice. To paraphrase, he said, "Just cause ya can doesn't mean ya should," and that the OP was putting his hardware at risk by trying to take it outside the pre-defined boundary. There really was nothing wrong with that statement. Though, it was already clear that the OP was intent on doing so regardless of the risk, and that he may not be aware that some cards are very capable of doing so.
Now, about what you said, jyjjy... The overclocking limits within CCC are not always well below the speeds that GPUs are capable of in all situations. While some cards generally do have more headroom than the defined parameters, others, even others of the exact same model or within the same family, do not. In the case of those that do have more headroom, that headroom is often only found on cards with an aggressively tuned, non-reference BIOS, or through modifications to the original BIOS' parameters. Those modifications, or tuning, usually involve voltage step-ups with much more precise clock and power curves. So no, the parameters CCC defines for a card are not always well below the speeds they can achieve. Some cards can't even max out within their pre-defined parameters due to limitations within their BIOS.
I downloaded several different BIOS packages from TechpowerUp for HD4890's, then loaded them into RBE to compare them. I found subtle differences in the BIOS of cards that have higher-than-reference factory OC settings than those which are set to run at reference speeds. The one setting that seemed to always change, though the change was sometimes only minor, was the voltage. But that doesn't mean that every RV790 chip within every 4890 card is capable of running at that voltage, or capable of the same OC clocks and stability. Download some and compare them for yourself. I found it interesting.