Yes the staying Below 1.4v is best.
As i was working my 2600x oc there is a point that increasing the core clock an extra .25 ghz took too much voltage increase for very little gain in the benchmarks.
So only you can determine if 1.47 @ 4.2g
Is worth a few extra cb points vs 4.125-4.150 at 1.37-1.3? ( voltage and ghz Just an Example )
See where that is going, did it take more voltage for a few extra points then what it's worth for cpu Longevity when you could end up with a little lower cb score with lower voltage and maintain longevity and lower temps.
On mine just because I could run Cinnabench didn't mean it could pass hrs of P-95 or hrs of Asus Realbench.
Thats where I lowered My Expectations and settled on good enough scores lower voltage / temps for Longevity as I knew I would end up using the 2600x on 2 more system upgrades.
That 2600x went into my son's till I got a 3600 for his then that 2600x landed in my wifes system and is running fine letting it do it own thing with Xfr2 enabled.
Check out buildzoid on LLC eventhough he is talking on a intel cpu it still explains what it is.
From what I have done on the 2600x and 3600x Ocing keeping LLC to level 3 has helped.
I ended up with Llc 3 + 140%current capability
@4.125g @1.35625v soc @1.10-1.12v for a stable 24/7 do anything you wanted with the system Oc with good temps in a room that had no A/c in the summer.
Ambient room temps where over 75f.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NMIh8dTdJwI