SpeedyVV :
Wow, what a great article. And very timely for me personally.
The fact that my current CPU, the E4300, was always at the bottom of that list, sure makes me want to take the plunge and go to one of their older brothers. Well, and the fact that my E4300 seems to run really hot does not help.
Now, what do I do? the e6750 $199, the q6600 $273, in real canadian dollars ;-)
Add to that another $62 over 1 year in hydro, and now we are talking big diff is $$$.
So I am thinking the e6750 for now, and then maybe 1 year from now, look at what is around in terms of CPUs and the apps that run on them.
What do you think?
How hot does your E4300 run? Is what stepping is it? I'd try a re-seating or new heatsink if you trust the settings you are getting.
I own a E6750 & a E4400 runs 50-51 degrees C on benchmark tests with the rebate Cooler Master that has been nearly free or close to it After Rebate for months. If you can deal with your system or find a cooler solution to running it (I assume you must be OC'ing it right)....then why not wait for a Penryn? Dual or Quad?
Penryn CPU's:
These are tray prices (per 1000) yes the price will initially sell for more as it did with the 333Mhz processors E6#50's release but the prices settled to within $10's of the tray price on the E6750 ($183) within 2 1/2 weeks as Microcenter and a few other stores began selling for prices @ $193.
Dual Core:
---E8500 - 3.16Ghz - 9.5 multiplier - 333 Base system clock - 6MB cache - $266 - Jan 08
---E8400 - 3.00Ghz - 9.0 multiplier - 333 Base system clock - 6MB cache - $183 - Jan 08
---E8300 - 2.83Ghz - 8.5 multiplier - 333 Base system clock - 6MB cache - $### - Jan 08
---E8200 - 2.66Ghz - 8.0 multiplier - 333 Base system clock - 6MB cache - $163 - Jan 08
Quad Core:
QX9650 - 3.00Ghz -unlockedmulti - 333 Base system clock - 12MB cache - $999 - Nov 12, 2007
---Q9550 - 2.83Ghz - 8.5 multiplier - 333 Base system clock - 12MB cache - $530 - Jan 08
---Q9450 - 2.66Ghz - 8.0 multiplier - 333 Base system clock - 12MB cache - $316 - Jan 08
---Q9330 - 2.50Ghz - 7.5 multiplier - 333 Base system clock --- 6MB cache - $266 - Jan 08
I don't Trust Tom's Hardwares information that I have quoted below:
You may ask "And what about Penryn?" Well, Intel only just released the new processor family based on a 45-nm production process. For now, only the flagship model costing $1,464 is available. Smaller and less-expensive CPUs are still a ways off. According to Intel, it may be March 2008 before we see smaller Penryn-based CPUs hit store shelves. Thus, the Penryn family is not really much of an option for the cost-conscious buyer for the time being. ....
I'd like to know where this information is actually coming from. Insider or simply Intel spokesperson...because Intel of course doesn't want people to stop buying the current lines...waiting in anticipation for Penryn. That would impact 4th quarter sales far too much.
Sites that have been SPOT on for the last three Intel releases or price drops give the above dates & tray prices (HKPEC, Techarp)... Jan 8th is a Hell of a lot sooner than "MARCH" even if the prices don't drop until sometime in February the prices are LESS than current E6#50 line while you get the benefits of SSE4, less power, therefore less heat, bigger cache (although...?)
One last note that waiting for the Penryn Quad cores if you desire a quad core will offer a step towards better efficiency. From an environmental standpoint there is little downside. Better on power & faster clock, more efficient code than what is currently available in a Q6600. Other than having to wait a few months... Zero Downside...unless your MOBO is not capable of 333 FSB.
Oh yeah, I disagree with the conclusion once again of TH. IF you heavily need to use Photoshop or transcoding video software constantly then Q6600 even now is the way to go if you can't wait for the 45nm's. TH intimating that the games due out over X-mas 2007 season will validate the Quad core purchase for those who are looking for things to do with the extra quads is misleading. At this point, games will not be written that can only be well played/enjoyed by the only the small few (but growing) legion of gamers who now occupy the quad core market! Game developers sell to the greatest market. That is as ridiculous a notion as the introduction of DX10 would bring about the rapid demise of DX 9 in cards or games.
Reminder beyond all its other many benefits, when transcoding programs were written to take advantage of SSE4 instructions in the new Penryn's the increase in one benchmark (using dual core was 81%)...that's well worth the wait for dual or quad core if your programs can/will be written using that kind of code.